May 27 – June 9, 2026

Highlights this week:

Greensite… done campaigning, back soon… Steinbruner… Speak up to save the landline… Bratton on KSCO… Hayes… Right Versus Left… Patton… Same Fate As The Dinosaurs?… Matlock… …festival of corruption… lies… bigotry… divisiveness… / … lawfare… weaponization… slushies… bitter regret… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… figureskating… Quotes on… “Summer”

...

DOWNTOWN SANTA CRUZ. Circa 1875. Those are the horsecar tracks going right down the middle of a very wide Pacific Avenue. The publicly owned horsecars would take folks
down to the beach…of course that idea had to be stopped – by some other city council I’ll bet.

Yes, that’s a fire on the left and I can’t find an exact date or location when it happened.

photo credit: Covello & Covello Historical photo collection.

Additional information always welcome: email photo@brattononline.com


If you want to pitch in to
keep this work of passion going,
we are ever so grateful!

...

Dateline: June 4, 2026

PORTLAND IS JUST LOVELY. I knew this before, of course, but I just had the most magical weekend in Portland. It was so fun! We saw the Stars on Ice show, went to the Portland Saturday Market, the Japanese Garden, Hale Pele Tiki Bar, and Hopscotch. The latter is an interactive art space that was just phenomenally fun! Throughout, all we had to do to move between places and back to our hotel was tap our phone or credit card, and step on the lightrail. I had forgotten how nice it is to have public transportation that works!

Not that I want to move out of this area (I *really* don’t!!!), but if I absolutely had to, Portland would be high on my list.

Hope your summer is starting out right!


~Webmistress

...

GOOD GIRL’S GUIDE TO MURDER. Netflix. Series. (6.8 IMDb) ***-
Think Nancy Drew meets True Detective. Five years after the apparent murder of a popular high school student, aspiring journalist Pip Fitz-Amobi decides the case doesn’t add up. What begins as a school project quickly turns into a deeper investigation, uncovering secrets, lies, and long-buried resentments in a town convinced the mystery was solved years ago.

The show’s biggest strength is Pip herself (Emma Myers – Jenna Ortega’s bouncy rainbow werewolf roommate on “Wednesday”): smart, determined, and believable as an amateur sleuth. While it never gets as dark as True Detective, it avoids feeling like a watered-down teen mystery, delivering genuine suspense, credible twists, and enough suspects to keep you guessing. Based on the novel by Holly Jackson, it’s a fast, engaging binge that captures the appeal of a classic detective story while giving it a modern true-crime sensibility.
~Sarge

GOOD OMENS 3. PrimeTV. Movie. (8 IMDb) ***-

In 1990, fantasy legend Terry Pratchett and young comic fantasy mavin Neil Gaiman collaborated on a novel built around the question, “What if the Antichrist got switched at birth?” and Good Omens was born.

In 2024, the third season of Amazon’s adaptation of the late Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s Good Omens was put on hold after multiple allegations of sexual assault against Gaiman surfaced in the news.

The Amazon version of Good Omens thrived on the brilliant chemistry between David Tennant and Michael Sheen as Crowley, a demon, and Aziraphale, an angel, who have spent millennia on Earth in what increasingly resembles a Cold War marriage. Faced with the impending Apocalypse, both come to the conclusion that maybe it might be altogether better … NOT doing that.

Featuring a host of charming side stories that all somehow linked together, plus a simmering relationship between the two leads, the first season felt like a delightful Douglas Adams pastiche. Since season one adapted the novel itself, the second season came as a complete surprise. Crafted entirely by Gaiman, it leaned harder into the Crowley/Aziraphale relationship, along with a gloriously naked and amnesiac Jon Hamm as the angel Gabriel. A great deal happens, and it all ends on a heartbreaking cliffhanger.

Then came season 3 … NOT!

As allegations against Gaiman mounted, stretching from the mid-80s into relatively recent years, comics, films, and television projects tied to him began getting canceled or shelved, including Good Omens 3. Fortunately, Gaiman stepped away from the production, allowing fans to get a third season … sort of. Cut down to a single feature-length finale, it still manages to wrap up a surprising number of story threads, and may even produce a few sniffles.

Gaiman’s problematic history aside, worth a watch.
~Sarge

PANTHEON. Netflix. Series. (8.5 IMDb) ****

What if the threat isn’t AI? What if it’s UI: uploaded intelligence. Human brains destructively scanned, living only in the cloud. “Pantheon” explores this idea as exquisite, real science fiction. Not cheesy animated sci-fi melodrama, but a genuine exploration of love, grief, immortality, endless simulations, conspiracies, global politics, and so much more.

The animation is restrained, there to serve the story rather than distract from it. The characters are rich, not cardboard cutouts, whether good or bad. No supervillains. No Mary Sues.

It’s a dense story, so if science fiction concepts tend to lose you, this may not be for you. But if they don’t, this absolutely deserves a watch.
~Sarge

STRANGER THINGS – TALES FROM ’85. Netflix. Series. (5 IMDb) ***

Stranger Things exits stage left…then pops back out for one more bow.

Set between seasons 2 and 3, this animated take brings back the core crew without sanding things down for kids. It’s not anime or cheap knockoff – dipping their pens in the Spiderverse/Arcane inkwell, with a creative, stylized look. It’s also more focused than the later live-action seasons, trimming most of the adults and zeroing in on the kids. Best of all, Will Byers actually gets to be a character instead of a punching bag, helped by the addition of Niki, an Amazonian punk rocker who connects with him over their shared outsider status. The recast voices are a little jarring at first, but you should settle in. Rough reviews aside, it’s worth a watch.

~Sarge

STRANGER THINGS (final season). Netflix. Series. (9.3 IMDb) ****

Final season, and once again Will Byers gets absolutely brain-fracked. For the uninitiated: Stranger Things is steeped in the early ’80s, following a quartet of young teens (I was all of 20 when it’s set) doing the usual – playing D&D, blasting a killer soundtrack, biking everywhere unsupervised… and occasionally getting snatched by nightmare creatures from the Upside Down, a vine-choked mirror of their hometown.

They cross paths with Eleven (Millie Bobby Brown), a runaway lab experiment with psychic powers and a deep love of Eggos. From there: more Upside Down lore, bigger and nastier villains, government conspiracies, a mall food court leveled, peak ’80s fashion, coming out, and a truly unfair amount of trauma for poor Will. Season 5 breaks up the cast in teams who each have their own stories – this season Linda “Sarah Conner” Hamilton pops up to give Vecna a run for his money as a “big bad”. Mike’s little sister gets dragged into things, and his mom finally gets to shine as a badass. It neatly cleans up all the loose threads. It’s both satisfying and a little sad to see it end – but no worries, the Duffer Brothers already have more Strangerverse on the way. Worth a watch.

~Sarge

PROJECT HAIL MARY. In theatres. Movie. (8.4 IMDb) ***-

This is hard-science sci-fi that blends in laughs without undercutting the tension. Ryan Gosling – somehow I’d never really noticed him before, sort of Arthur Davrill – plays Ryland Grace, a middle-school science teacher turned astronaut, who wakes up alone on a spaceship light-years from home with zero memory of why he’s there. Slowly, he pieces together that Earth’s survival literally hangs on him – and then he meets an alien whose planet is in just as much trouble. Cue the odd-couple science team: two species, zero common language, and enough physics to make your head spin. Gosling is charmingly competent, the alien is nicely alien (not just a guy in a weird forehead prosthetic), and while the story feels a lot like The Martian, it’s a solid high-stakes ride. I enjoyed it, even with the odd shortcomings. Running 2:36, it didn’t really lag. Definitely worth a watch.

~Sarge

THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) ***-
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?

Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge

SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb) **-

This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.

Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).

Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.

Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.

~Sarge

Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown.

Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com

...

Gillian will be on the radio show, Bratton on KSCO, on Friday. She’ll be back to writing soon.

Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association  http://darksky.org  Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild.

...
SPEAK UP TO SAVE LANDLINES FOR RELIABLE EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION

The CPUC rulemaking proceeding is R.24-06-012. The proceeding documents are here. At the top of the page is a tab “Public Comments”. The public comments page has a button Add a Comment. Very important: contact state representatives including Sen. John Laird, and the Board of Supervisors to support landlines.

Many thanks to Ms. Nina Beety for posting the information below on her new website,  “Monterey Bay Matters”

Critical Deadlines

  • June 2, 12:00pm PDT – Opposition statements due to CA Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee on Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
  • June 11, 3:30pm PDT – Opposition statements due to CA Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee on Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
  • June 15 – Comment deadline for FCC dockets 26-120 and 26-121
  • June 22 – Comment deadline for FCC dockets 26-123 and 26-125

AT&T petitions to discontinue landline and Lifeline – 26-121, 26-120, 26-125, 26-123

AT&T filed the following petitions to the FCC to eliminate landlines and Lifeline in areas of California including in the Monterey Bay region. These petitions will be automatically granted if there is no opposition.

Deadlines for filing comments/opposition: June 15 and 22, 2026

WC Docket No. 26-121 AT&T application to discontinue residential (due 6/15)
WC Docket No. 26-120 AT&T application to discontinue business (due 6/15)
WC Docket No. 26-123 AT&T petition for forbearance from ETC including Lifeline (due 6/22)
26-125 AT&T petition for preemption and declaratory ruling (due 6/22)

Because the FCC streamlined the process to allow carriers to discontinue landline service as part of a “technology transition”, these requests are automatically granted in most cases. Filing oppositions is the only way to protest AT&T discontinuance plans; it stops the FCC from automatically granting the applications. If they receive opposition, the FCC will remove AT&T’s application from “streamlining” and perform a review.

These applications contain the notice mailed 5/20 to customers.

Filing Oppositions or Comments is not difficult. To submit them to the FCC, you can prepare a letter and upload it (ECFS Standard Filing) or type/paste a comment into ECFS Express Filing. Note on your document which docket you are commenting on.

Instructions for the longer Standard Filing form:
Proceeding: Start typing the docket number such as 26-125  and the docket title will pop up . Click on the title and it will fill in the line.
Fill in starred lines.
Type of Filing: Click on the box and choose Comment or Opposition (I’ve requested clarification from the FCC)
Address of: Click on box and choose whichever is correct
Fill out remaining red starred items.
Upload your document(s).
Click in yellow box.
Click blue Continue to Review Screen and submit from there.

FINANCIAL HELP FOR WATSONVILLE HOSPITAL AND MOVING FORWARD
The Watsonville Hospital just got a big financial boost from Senator Laird’s bill to provide $25 million to struggling hospitals.  According to a recent presentation to Santa Cruz County LAFCO by Hospital CEO Stephen Gray, Watsonville Hospital was one of four applicants chosen to receive grant funding.  Eleven hospitals applied.

Of the $25 million available, Watsonville Hospital received $10.6 Million.  One condition of the grant is that the Hospital must continue functioning under current leadership, and cannot be sold or handed over to another provider to run it.   This will require a delicate balance of ownership vs. control if the Hospital continues to pursue a public partnership with another larger care provider, as is the current plan, according to Gray.

Laird bill will help Watsonville Community Hospital | The Pajaronian | Watsonville, CA

CEO Gray also responded to public query at the LAFCO meeting regarding the thousands of parcels erroneously charged or not charged at all for the Measure N parcel tax to support the Pajaro Valley Health Care District (PVHCD) funding of the Hospital.  He said County financial staff had attended a PVHCD Board meeting and apologized for the significant mistake, assuring the Board it had been corrected.   In my opinion, the boundaries of the District need to be examined.  They were hastily-drawn to help provide emergency funding to keep the Hospital from closing.  I would be happy to pay to keep this good hospital open but my rural Aptos area was not included within the boundaries, even though urban Aptos and Rio del Mar are.  Our family has always, at the advice of our doctor, sought emergency medical help at Watsonville Hospital because there is a much lower incidence of drug-resistant Staph infection or MURSA.

CEO Gray mentioned in the LAFCO presentation that last year’s cyber attack had cost the Hospital alot of money, and required dipping into the eight days-worth of cash reserves available and banking on the patience of suppliers to extend payment deadlines.  Luckily, insurance did re-imburse those expenses and revenue losses, but it took awhile.

CEO Gray has announced his resignation, effective next month.  He has led the transition well from a for=profit owner near bankruptcy to a publicly-owned hospital serving the local community.

Who will fill his shoes?  I predict it will be Santa Cruz County Deputy CEO Marcus Pimentel….just a hunch.  He is on the Board, and is passionate about saving the Hospital.  Stay tuned. Marcus Pimentel

SUTTER CANCER CENTER PROJECT PROPOSED FOR SKYVIEW DRIVE-IN THEATER SPACE
Maybe you have been wondering about the fate of the former Skyview Drive-In Theater?  A few months ago, Sutter Health, via Swift Consulting, filed a pre-application with the County Planning Dept. for a single-story Cancer Center that would occupy about half of the parcel.  Future plans for the other half include potential residential units and expanded medical clinics.
Major Project Applications, Santa Cruz County

I wonder about the traffic study?  Stay tuned.

It is too bad the Flea Market got closed down in 2021.

ASK THE SECOND DISTRICT SUPERVISOR ABOUT THE TWO 5-6 STORY BUILDINGS PLANNED FOR APTOS
No public meetings are scheduled for this colossal project in Aptos, near State Park Drive, but you can ask Second District Supervisor Kimberly DeSerpa about it at her June 22 Constituent meeting (5-6:30pm) at the Aptos Library.  According to her recent newsletter, the development will now include two 5 or 6-story apartment buildings and nearly 200 three-story townhomes, for a total of about 400 residential units.

Wow.

Will there be an environmental impact review?  Not likely.

 “Village on the Green” at 2600 Mar Vista Drive (adjacent to the pedestrian bridge under construction over Highway One) could be another Swenson Builder project:

Village on the Green, Development Review Group Application 251471
On November 20, 2025, an application was submitted for a Development Review Group (DRG), a pre-application for the review of a housing development proposal on the site of the former Aptos Par 3 golf course. County staff from several County departments and other public agencies will review this proposal to develop 197 “for sale” 3-bedroom townhomes (each with attached 2-car garage) and a 7-story apartment structure with 215 affordable units and 274 parking spaces on the 13.85-acre site, with the intent to determine the extent of further information needed to process the application, as well as assess the project for compliance with all County ordinances. Relevant comments, corrections, and conditions will be provided to the applicant to be incorporated into proposed project, prior to the formal application.

Major Project Applications, Santa Cruz County

BRATTON ON KSCO RADIO EVERY FRIDAY AT 6PM
You can now listen to  a variety of topics discussed by revolving hosts from Bratton Online contributors, every Friday, 6pm-7pm on KSCO Radio, AM 1080 or streaming ksco.com/listen

Grey Hayes hosted a program recently, and last week’s program featured Thomas Leavitt discussing local history and place names, and the importance of preserving historic and cultural resources.

This Friday, June 12 will feature Gillian Greensite discussing her recent campaign for Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz.
Listen in!

WRITE ONE LETTER.  MAKE ONE CALL.  MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE THIS WEEK BY JUST DOING ONE THING.

Cheers,
Becky

Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.

Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com

...
Right Versus Left

One of the most important lessons I have received, which has allowed me to better understand politics, is the fundamental difference between the Right and Left. The Left believes people are born basically as good beings and the Right believes people are born as bad beings. From there, the Left believes in nurturing the goodness and the Right believes in correcting the badness. So, a Left-leaning person gives people the tools to do good. And, a Right-leaning person forces people into doing what they think is right. Nurturing at one end of the spectrum and violence at the other. It is amazing to watch the world through this lens.

Doing the Best They Can

Some of the most regular phrases I hear from my left-leaning community are “they’re doing the best they can,” or, “I’m doing my best.” Normally, these phrases are offered for situations where things aren’t going well. For instance, when I have criticized State Parks for fraudulent behavior and misshapen alliances with the recreational industry, left-leaning people have responded ‘they’re doing their best, they just need more funding.’ Or, when people have made mistakes that have led to breaking expensive things by doing procedures completely wrong, these left leaning people have said to me “I tried!” In the first case, how do we know that State Parks has hired the right people? Perhaps the unqualified staff ARE doing the best they can, but then why did they get hired in the first place? And, in the second case, why did the person even try to do something that they didn’t understand enough not to break? Is left-leaning ‘belief’ getting in the way of a better world?

They Protect What They Appreciate

Another way that these left-leaning attitudes crop up is with protection of Nature. Billions of dollars are spent on nature documentaries, museums, zoos, and public access trails into conservation areas with the idea that these activities are crucial to biodiversity protection. “People won’t support protection for something they don’t understand” is the frequent logical support given for these activities. I ask those with this belief how it is working out, really. Why do we have near zero politicians who support conservation with so many people so well impacted by documentaries, zoos, and trail experiences?

Left Leaning Politicians

It seems to me that the faulty logic systems I have just described are propped up by a hierarchical system that maintains power because of such shallow dialogues. If State agencies that protect the environment are seen as ‘doing the best they can,’ then politicians are off the hook. If mediocre education about the environment passes for engagement in conservation, then there is no threat to the politicians and their business partners and funders. Politicians dam the environment with faint praise constantly. “Let’s recognize so-and-so for their leadership in preserving Cotoni Coast Dairies” is one trope when in fact the property faces severe and increasing threats, as is normal after a land is ‘preserved.’

Meanwhile, on the Right

As the left-leaning politicians gently slip the poison pill to their constituents, the right-leaning politicians just bludgeon them. “Face reality,” they say, “humans are going to destroy the environment, so let’s get rich doing it right now!” If you disagree with this statement, you are attacked, threatened, tortured, and/or killed.

Equivalence?

The right-leaning people are destroying the environment Right Now and the left-leaning people are doing it A Little Slower and much more subtly, a little more blindly, and perhaps not as efficiently. This is not to say that the two are equivalent: the speed of the destruction is meaningful. Perhaps the slower change allows more people to realize the losses in Nature or the connection between loss of biodiversity and their own decline of standard of living. Perhaps the slower pace of destruction allows us to realize that protection of Nature is not a left- vs. right- political issue…it is an issue that transcends politics.

Accountability and Victims

I recently attended a right-leaning gathering where everyone detailed just how victimized they were by the government, environmentalists, and by their neighbors. I was there to help find solutions, but it was impossible to keep the conversation focused on that when there were so many victim stories to tell. The politician in the group led credibility to the victim stories. Law enforcement in the group steadfastly upheld the standard, conservative “law and order” narrative while also clearly communicating how legal codes had victimized his community. Solutions, no. Vitriol, plenty.

Conflict Aversion

I have seen left-leaning communities succumb to conflict aversion, stunting their ability to create positive change. If everyone is doing their best, who am I to bring up any conflict? Thank this lefty proclivity for a wealth of under-performing environmental regulations. In one state or another, the State Wildlife Agency personnel were asked why they didn’t regulate dams for healthy fish populations, as they were charged by state statute? They responded that if they were to prosecute that statute, politicians might revoke that statute. This is called ‘slippage,’ and it is evident in many arenas, especially, locally: the California Coastal Act, Santa Cruz County ordinances protecting rivers/streams or other threatened ecosystems, and the Porter-Cologne and US Clean Water Acts. A newspaper may one day publish this story:

Poisoned Waters

We contacted Assemblyperson Martin’s office to find out why water quality in the Elkhorn Slough has consistently been ranked the worst in the nation for decades. Office staff responded “Our Community deserves safe recreational access to the Slough while supporting the vital agricultural industry surrounding it. And so, we have been in many meetings to advance incremental policy improvements. By the end of the next fiscal year, I’m sure we will have something to propose. Meanwhile, we urge our constituents to remain engaged by following us on @plickitupoo.assemblypoo.gov”

Conservation Heroes

Demonstrating his ongoing concern for conservation, Senator Smith introduced a bill to support wage growth for facilities management employees of California State Parks. “Our Parks employees do their best every day to maintain 2,200 miles of recreational trails Statewide. They are working hard to provide access to every Californian. They deserve more recognition.” Union representatives for Facilities Management Employees expect to sign the raise agreement in the next few days.

Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net

Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com

...

Tuesday, June 2, 2026

If you have been following the news, you probably know that SpaceX will soon promote an Initial Public Offering (IPO) – a sale of its stock to the public. This stock offering will possibly end up making Elon Musk (pictured) the world’s first trillionaire. As the BBC tells us, in the article I have linked in the first line of this blog posting, “SpaceX makes rockets, offers a satellite internet service called Starlink, and also owns Musk’s controversial artificial intelligence (AI) firm xAI. The initial public offering (IPO) on the US stock market is set to be the largest in Wall Street history and could start next month under the ticker symbol SPCX.”

Naturally, the BBC is not alone in covering this news. The Saturday-Sunday, May 23-24, 2026, edition of The Wall Street Journal had a couple of articles on the SpaceX IPO. SpaceX’s Ambitions Are Intergalactic. Its Business Is Selling You Internet.” Corrie Driebusch’s article appeared under this headline: “SpaceX Is Aiming for Civilization on Mars. Its IPO Couldn’t Be More Old School.” Both of these are worth reading, and I think that clicking on the links will get you to them. Here is an excerpt from Cohen’s column that caught my attention (emphasis added):

SpaceX consists of three segments: space, AI and connectivity, which is primarily driven by Starlink. Last year, the Starlink division was responsible for $11 billion of revenue, which amounted to more than 60% of the company’s total sales. It was the most valuable part of the business—and the only profitable one. And for years, it has been absolutely essential to the success of SpaceX. As it turns out, even companies that defy the laws of gravity are bound by the laws of economics.

The mysterious finances of Musk’s company were detailed this week in SpaceX’s IPO filing, which is far more bonkers than financial paperwork has any right to be.

The highlights include the company describing itself as “the most ambitious, vertically integrated innovation engine on (and off) Earth,” claiming a total addressable market of $29 trillion, revealing that Musk’s pay package is tied to “the establishment of a permanent human colony on Mars with at least one million inhabitants” and declaring: “We do not want humans to have the same fate as dinosaurs.”

Now, when I say that the report above “caught my attention,” I am somewhat understating my reaction. First, Musk, apparently, thinks that it’s actually going to be possible to transport a “human colony” to Mars – a “colony” with “at least one million inhabitants.” Remember how much time, effort, and money it took to put a couple of guys on the Moon? A million on Mars? Wow! That’s a truly different thing, indeed.

But check out the last line I have quoted. Musk doesn’t “want humans to have the same fate as dinosaurs.” We do remember what happened to the dinosaurs, right? They all died, as conditions on Earth changed to make the planet incapable of supporting their life, going forward.

So…. it looks like Musk believes that this is what’s going to happen in the relatively near term (within Musk’s lifetime) with respect to human beings. Humans are either going to die out here on Earth, or they are going to have to migrate to Mars, to avoid extinction. As a personal note, Mars does not seem very hospitable, or a nice place to live, at least to me (witness the photo below).

My suggestion? Let’s forget about putting our money into a company that is betting against the continued ability of human beings to live on Planet Earth, and start investing our money on keeping Earth habitable. Wouldn’t it make more sense to use our financial resources to fight off global warming, and to bring peace to the world (eliminating the possibility of a global nuclear war), instead of betting on some whacked-out potential trillionaire’s dream that he, and a million or so pals, can all scoot off to Mars, avoiding the extinction of human life on this planet?

Check out the pictorial comparison below. Don’t you agree that sticking with Earth is the better bet?


Earth


Mars

Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net

Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com

...

250 FOR 250, THE GOAT, BLOWN HONOR, TIP OFF TO TIP OVER

Katherine Stewart, author of ‘The Power Worshippers: Inside the Dangerous Rise of Religious Nationalism’, and ‘Money, Lies and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy’, has written an interesting take on Trump’s plans for the country’s 250th birthday celebration. “In another world with a better government in power, Americans might well have looked forward to an authentic celebration of the remarkable achievements of the American Revolution. In this world, under the Trump administration and the Republican rubber-stamp chorus in Congress, we are being asked to settle for a festival of corruption, lies, bigotry and divisiveness,” she begins.

The Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise & Thanksgiving, billed as “part of the broader Freedom 250 initiative,” was held on May 17 on the National Mall, with a relatively sparse gathering to see and hear Christian nationalist “faith leaders, public servants, music, prayer, and testimony to honor God’s hand in America’s story.” Hosted by a private foundation in partnership with the White House, it brought together those dedicated to replacing American democracy with a supposedly Christian autocracy. Speaker Paula White-Cain, senior faith adviser to Trump, said the event was “about the history and the foundations of our nation, which was built on Christian values, on the Bible. This is really truly rededicating the country to God,” she remarked. Stewart’s observation is that Freedom 250 was fundamentally about rededicating the country to outright corruption, flying in the face of America’s Founders who attempted to avoid the kind of extractive and imperial system of government seen in the British Empire, as the program “diverted tens of millions in taxpayer funds to a nakedly sectarian and partisan festival,” going further by inviting corporate and foreign donors to contribute.

According to The Wall Street Journal, the president also proposes offering 250 pardons to celebrate the 250th — a real triumph for the rule of law! Any predictions on who might be a recipient in Trump’s pay-for-play freedom pardon scam? “But there’s a higher order of corruption at work here, not unlike that practiced by the remaining ‘clean’ ‘conservative’ justices on the Supreme Court — not the ones who won’t accept free camper buses, school tuition, and luxury holidays from their conservative patrons. This is where officers of the United States, even while paying lip service to the Constitution, flout their responsibilities and instead pervert our democratic system for power and aggrandizement. When a political leader directs government to reward a particular band of extremist supporters and disenfranchise the rest of the population, that is corruption, not democracy,” insists Stewart.

Stewart remarks, “On this semiquincentennial, one might have hoped for some expressions of unity. America’s Founders, after all, prized unity almost too much. That is why they made so many compromises in their quest to create a United States of America. But Freedom 250, like everything Trumpian, is about dividing America, not uniting it. It’s there to tell us that there are ‘good’ Americans and ‘bad’ Americans. The good ones are Bible-believing Christians. The bad ones include media that reported accurately on the fiasco of the Iran war, for example; anyone who criticizes Dear Leader; and, of course, those who fail to adhere to the nation’s supported founding faith.” The Founders understood that the surest way to divide the new nation would be to introduce a national religion into a country that was even then incredibly diverse in its mingling of faith traditions — some things they may have erred on, but on this point they were absolutely correct. Thomas Jefferson famously and correctly celebrated the First Amendment as a means of erecting ‘a wall of separation between church and state’. Now Trump’s plan is to ‘celebrate’ the Founders’ achievement by demolishing that wall.

By rejecting the aristocratic pretensions of the Old World, the Founders felt it to be vital to give the new democracy a certain kind of dignity, making a determined effort to prove that a government of the people could also rise to worthy levels of cultural achievement. So what is Trump giving us? The Ultimate Fighting Championship to entertain us with the spectacle of bare-knuckled men punching one another in the face within the unsightly arena that we now see rising on the White House lawn! Stewart concludes, “We can be sure that the Trump administration and its MAGA supporters will deride critics of Freedom 250 as somehow anti-American. We should not let them get away with it. We should oppose this kind of squalid, divisive festival of grift, not because we despise America but because we continue to support the ideals upon which the nation was founded. Maybe the most American thing we can do in this sad and degenerate moment in history is to find a way to celebrate American principles of equality, pluralism, and justice — independent of this partisan rally, which the present malefactors in government are using to destroy democracy itself.”

Discovered is President Trump’s purchase of $15,000 to $50,000 worth of TKO Group Holdings as he began his promotion of the UFC birthday event on the lawn outside the People’s House. The Daily Dose of Democracy group says they are willing to give him a pass on this one if he will put his money where his mouth is and hop into the ring with the fighters. The company will see its star rise with all the free publicity spouted by the president. Jordan Libowitz of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington says, “Grifting has always been an issue in Donald Trump’s presidency, but now the mask is off. Using the White House to promote a company whose stock you bought while promoting it is one of the worst conflicts of interest you could imagine. The agenda of this administration seems to start and stop with how to make Donald Trump richer.”

Since Trump’s announcement last summer about hosting the UFC Championship at the White House, he hasn’t shut his mouth about it, even inviting UFC fighters to the Oval Office to show off the AI-generated images of the octagon arena. “We’re going to have 4,000 seats in front of the door of the White House. The hardest ticket I’ve ever had, too. This will be the greatest show on earth,” bragged the president. The spectacle is touted as part of the nation’s 250th birthday, but the arena will be completed for scheduled use on June 14 — coincidentally, the President’s 80th birthday. Attorney Norm Eisen calls the brutal event an “extravagant waste of money and government time, serving not only to distract from the real work of the government but now may result in a pecuniary benefit to the president. That is a far uglier White House spectacle than anything that the UFC will exhibit.”

UFC chief executive Dana White, a Trump supporter, claims the UFC 250 event will not be an inherently political event. “You can make anything political if you want to,” he says, confident that the fight will “positively deliver” for the president and his group. But some in the mixed martial arts and pro fighting world are less than enthusiastic about the prospect of the event — onetime ally of the president, podcaster Joe Rogan not holding back. In his estimation the idea of outside fighting is problematic, and there is no weather contingency plan, especially since WashingtonDC can reach temps of 100 degrees by June. Rogan would prefer an inside, air-conditioned venue, calling Trump’s extravaganza a “gimmick” and a “security nightmare“.

John Byrne of Raw America posts that as the country turns 250, Trump wanted to have “a concert worthy of an emperor. What he is getting instead is a punchline.” Or a punch in the face. His plan was to have a star-studded musical extravaganza on the National Mall running from late June into July, but a steady stream of artists who were previously announced are now giving notice that they no longer showing up, claiming they were misled regarding the partisan nature of the Freedom 250 concerts — entitled Great American State Fair. It looks as thought the hangers-on are Milli Vanilli, and Vanilla Ice, who said, “I don’t even vote, so I don’t even care.” Byrne says, “There’s something almost perfect about all of it. A president who governs through spectacle planned a spectacle, and the actual artists of the country looked at the invitation and said ‘no’. The founders built a republic, not a monarchy, specifically so that no one man’s birthday became a national obligation.”

In his attempt to recover from the musical snubs, Trump announced that he plans to hold a political rally to celebrate America’s 250th anniversary, posting, “I understand Artists are getting ‘the yips’ having to do with their performance, so I am thinking about bringing the Number One Attraction anywhere in the World, the man who gets much larger audiences than Elvis in his prime, and he does so without a guitar, the man who loves our Country more than anyone else, the man who some say is the Greatest President in History (THE GOAT!), DONALD J. TRUMP, to take the place of these highly paid, Third Rate ‘Artists,’ and give a major speech, rallying the Country forward like I have done ever since being President!

Robert Reich posted on Substack, “Beware of Trump’s 250th Rally on the Mall — he’s given up on the ‘talent’ except for You Know Who.” Reich says that Trump often confuses himself with America, and America with himself; so not surprisingly, his plan for celebrating the nation’s 250th anniversary is looking more and more like a celebration of Trump. In addition, Trump’s face will be engraved on a new $250 bill; it will be etched onto both sides of a celebratory gold coin; it’s already on passports issued this year. His signature is on dollar bills. If you still fail to get the point, his visage will soon be draped over all federal buildings. Reich finds it difficult to read the president’s THE GOAT! post without laughing, but it’s no joke as his malignant narcissism ramps up even higher than its usual galactic level.

In a follow up post on Truth SocialTrump writes, “I am ordering my Representatives to look at the feasibility of doing an AMERICA IS BACK Rally on Wednesday, Washington, DC, same time, same location. Only Great Patriots invited — It will be a Wild and Beautiful Celebration of America!” Reich reminds us that the ‘Great Patriots’ and ‘will be wild’ phrasing harkens back to Trump’s encouraging his rioters preceding the January 6, 2021 insurrection. We shouldn’t expect another attack on the Capitol — just attacks toward immigrants, MuslimsDemocrats, trans people, RINOs, judges and anyone ‘woke,’ as Trump stars in his own hate rally.

Reich explains that our 250th anniversary events, commemorating America’s founders’ refusal to be bound by a tyrant, were supposed to be planned by a nonpartisan, nonprofit group created by Congress in 2016, called ‘America250.’ The bipartisan congressional caucus made up of over 350 members, with honorary co-chairs George W BushLaura BushBarack Obama, and Michelle Obama, plus ex-officio members to include present and former government officials, have had no hand in planning the anniversary events with the circumvention by Trump/MAGA and their ‘Freedom250‘ committee. This renegade group is bankrolling events to promote Trump and his political agenda which lists its ‘core theme‘ of boosting Trump’s supposed ‘achievements.’ And as might be expected the group is designed to make money for Trump, with his personal business trademarking the term ‘Trump 250,’ along with a logo similar to that of the ‘America250’ logo.

In fact, several trademark applications in connection with the upcoming celebration feature Trump’s name as the centerpiece for use on bumper stickers, tote bags, drink ware, clothing, and golf balls, with Trump’s online store already selling sweatshirts, golf balls, and a blanket. Mimicking the ballroom project’s pay-to-play scam, people and companies with financial interests affected by the administration are encouraged to make tax-deductible donations to gain access to, and seek favors from, the president. Those corporations paying between $500,000 and $10 million become “sponsors” and those giving $1 million or more will be invited to a “private Freedom 250 thank-you reception” hosted by you-know-who. Major donors contributing $2.5 million or more will qualify for a speaking role at the Fourth of July celebration in Washington, so we can expect to hear leaders of Lockheed MartinExxonMobilOraclePalantirMastercard, and United Airlines — so far. Stay tuned.

Count yourself in as a contributor to Trump and his ‘Freedom 250‘ extravaganza, because in last year’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill‘ was a Congressional allocation of $150 million for observances of the nation’s birthday. The Interior Department chose to dole out $100 million to the Trump organization, with only $25 million going to the official nonpartisan ‘America250‘ group. Stay tuned on disclosure of expenses in this siphoning of taxpayer funding — only if you stay attuned until 2027! Reich says, “This is exactly what Trump did to the Kennedy Center, the Smithsonian Institution, the National Capital Planning Commission, and every other semi-public body Congress established for the common good. This is the way authoritarianism substitutes for democracy — slowly and incrementally, until the whole system suddenly tips over.”

Elliot Kirschner writing on Substack’s Through the Fog, asks if anyone really feels like celebrating America’s 250th, even though it’s only a month away? He imagines what could be taking place if only we had a unifying president, with participation by American musical giants, to inspire a soaring sense of pride, and a belief that despite all our differences and the dark chapters in our history, that we are part of an ambitious experiment in multi-racial, multi-ethnic democracy. He says that America loves a good party, but that notion is now a “casualty of our troubled times — another opportunity for good feeling and unity lost to the boorish squatter in our nation’s capital as he tracks mud of corruption, vindictiveness, and divisive autocracy across our national fabric.” Instead of proceeding with this fiasco, he suggests we give ourselves a raincheck until this nightmare is over, waiting a few years to find a way to celebrate our democracy. “Then, we can have the biggest party ever, bringing together artists and teachers, immigrants and veterans, scientists and musicians, people from every corner of this sprawling and complicated country. A party about the best of America. A party that is joyful instead of angry. Inclusive instead of exclusionary. A party to which everyone is invited,” concludes Kirschner. “Well, almost everyone.”

Satirist Andy Borowitz writes, “In a last ditch attempt to salvage his ‘US Freedom 250’ concert, Donald J. Trump announced Monday that the only remaining musical act  will be Secretary of State Marco Rubio playing a kazoo…According to sources, Rubio is taking his new assignment extremely seriously, spending hours practicing the kazoo in the Situation Room. In an official statement, Rubio declared, ‘I am honored to blow anything President Trump asks me to.'”


[Last week’s piece below… ~Webmistress]

MARCO, PAYDAY FOR POOPERS, MARCO, FRAUD BUFFET, MARCO

The ensnared federal government ‘agreed’ to drop the tax claims against President Donald Trump last week according to a settlement document that also resolves Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over the leak of his tax returns, along with a public apology from the agency. The agreement reads that the US is “forever barred and precluded” from examining or prosecuting Trump, his sons and the Trump organization’s current tax issues, simply a one-page document posted to the Department of Justice website. An adjunct to this agreement allowed the administration to create a nearly $1.8 billion fund to compensate allies of the president who believe they have been unjustly investigated and prosecuted, which brought howls from the Democrats and government watchdog groups as “corrupt” and unconstitutional. Formally called the “Anti-Weaponization Fund“, it provides an avenue for those “wrongly targeted” for political purposes — particularly by the Biden administration’s Justice Department — to apply for payouts, which acting Attorney General Todd Blanche terms a “a lawful process for victims of lawfare and weaponization to be heard and seek redress.” The 1600 rioters who were charged, then fined or imprisoned, could see a payday of about a million bucks each!

The Late Show host, Stephen Colbert, during his last week on his canceled CBS show, had some thoughts on the newly-created “slush fund,” and how “one group of lucky slushies could be the people prosecuted in connection with the January 6 Capitol riot.” “We may be canceled, but apparently The Late Show has outlived the Constitution of the United States, because yesterday, without any congressional or court approval, completely unilaterally, Donald Trump gave himself a $1.8 billion taxpayer-fueled slush fund,” said the comedian to begin his show. Colbert noted that in JanuaryTrump and Sons filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, alleging that the bureau willfully failed to safeguard his tax information from unauthorized disclosure by a former IRS contractor during the president’s first term. The judge involved in the case was “highly skeptical” of its validity, prompting Trump and Sons to drop the suit in exchange for establishment of the “slush fund” by Todd Blanche.

[ click here to continue (link expands, click again to collapse) ]


[Last week’s piece below… ~Webmistress]

Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com