March 18 – 31, 2026
Greensite… on why I’m running for Mayor, Part 2 Steinbruner… new County Youth Commission, Santa Cruz transportation… Hayes… Environmental Politics in Polite Company Patton… TDS… Matlock… excursions…supporter list…sleeper cells… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… zippers! Quotes on… “Precision”
|
|
If you want to pitch in to |
HOLD YOUR FRIENDS CLOSE. This weekend we say goodbye to my best friend, who passed away in December. I’m having the memorial at my house, and I feel like I’m scrambling more than usual. It will all be fine, eventually, I know that from experience, but in the meantime by brain is running like a car being revved to oblivion, while in neutral… lots of noise, but no movement. Losing people sucks. I think I’ve had a lot of death in my life from a fairly early age, but I’m not sure it’s getting easier to deal with. This was also completely out of the blue unexpected, and I’m not sure I’ve really comprehended that she’s gone yet. It will be nice to see people this weekend, and I since do want this event to go smoothly, I better get back to work. Take care, all of you!
~Webmistress
THE PITT. Hulu, Max. Series. (8.97 IMDb) ![]()
Noah Wyle is back in the ER… can George Clooney be far behind?
Set in a brutally busy Pittsburgh ER, a grizzled Wyle leads a rotating pack of residents, interns, and students through near–real-time shifts (one episode = one hour, one season = one day). The writing is sharp, the characters click, and the show pulls no punches on nudity or bodily damage—approach with caution, but it’s worth it. Season two is still rolling out weekly. Now with more ICE!
~Sarge

SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb)
This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.
Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).
Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.
Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.
~Sarge
A MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS. Prime. Movie. (3.5 IMDb)
Half a point for being in focus. Joan Collins fronting for a series – at least according to the end card. Six… “people,” I guess… reunite at an Airbnb “castle” owned by a legendary mystery writer, played by Joan Collins. One of them ends up floating in the hot tub. That’s about it.
Everyone treats Joan Collins as a full-blown Mary Sue: “You’re a great mystery writer – we should all listen to you.” What does she actually do? Watch security cameras that most of the cast already know about, while they continue misbehaving anyway.
It’s embarrassing to watch, especially since I’m reasonably sure she bankrolled it. Not worth a watch. Stand well back. Mind the gap. Go watch “Agatha Christie’s 7 Dials” on Netflix.
~Sarge
THE LAST KIDS ON EARTH. Netflix. Series (1hr pilot). (7.2 IMDb) ![]()
This largely bloodless animated series began with a pilot-style special and ran for two seasons. It’s based on the children’s book series by Max Brallier, with character designs inspired by the illustrations of Douglas Holgate.
The story follows orphan Jack Sullivan as he adjusts to life after an invasion of extra-dimensional monsters and a zombie apocalypse. He soon bands together with a scrappy group of kids who missed the evacuation – along with a loyal monster-dog – forming their own ragtag survival team.
Aimed primarily at the 8–12 crowd, the show still has enough sharp humor and creature-feature flair to entertain adults. The voice cast includes Nick Wolfhard (brother of Finn), Mark Hamill, Keith David, Catherine O’Hara, and Rosario Dawson. Worth a watch – with or without your kids.
~Sarge
AGATHA CHRISTIE’S SEVEN DIALS. Netflix. Series. (6.2 IMDb)
There have been a fair few non-Poirot/Marple adaptations recently, and this is certainly one of them.
The cast is solid – Martin Freeman is great, and Mia McKenna-Bruce really shines in the lead role (though Helena Bonham Carter kind of phones in a stock twitchy character). The film doesn’t quite hook you into the mystery, though. It’s not slow, just… not all that engaging. The highlight for me was definitely Mia jumping out of a window to dodge a wedding proposal. On the plus side, it’s only 3 episodes. Many clocks.
It’s probably worth a watch if you’re looking for something to pass the time before the next episode of your favorite show drops.
~Sarge
THE MUPPET SHOW. Disney+. Series. (8.4 IMDb) ![]()
Or, as I like to think of it, ANTI-MELANIA. They both star a woman who is completely self-obsessed, clinging to a less attractive mate’s position: I mean, of course, the return of … THE MUPPET SHOW!
That’s right, the same old gang at the same old theatre. Minus the legendary Jim Henson and Frank Oz (who is still alive, at time of writing), it actually defies the concern of losing the magic – it’s almost like it never ended. Which is a good thing. Only one episode so far, but it’s off to a good start. Worth a watch!
~Sarge
LA BELLE ET LA BÊTE (1946). Disney+, Max. Movie. (7.4 IMDb) ![]()
Just ran back across this amazing version of Beauty and the Beast (literally haven’t watched it since the early 90’s), with amazing magical settings, and honestly a beast you like so much more than the Prince underneath. There are a number of visuals that have found their way into other lesser films. Jean Marais literally smolders in his cat-like beast. In French with English subtitles. Ça vaut le détour.
~Sarge
RIOT WOMEN. BritBox. Series. (8.5 IMDb)
In the early ’90s, a musical revolution erupted – one part punk, many parts feminism – spearheaded by bands like Bikini Kill and Bratmobile (<3): "Riot Grrrl". It laid the foundation for bands like L7 and Hole, whose raw energy and unapologetic attitudes reshaped rock music. Fast forward 35 years, and those fierce grrrls are now navigating the challenges of menopause. Enter Riot Women, a series that follows a group of "women of a certain age" who've had it up to here with hot flashes and feeling invisible. What starts as a joke quickly transforms into something more: they decide to start their own band. While only a few episodes are currently available on BritBox (released weekly), the show's got heart, humor, and plenty of punch. If you've ever felt overlooked or dismissed, Riot Women is a riotous reminder that it's never too late to reclaim your voice. Available exclusively on BritBox (via PrimeVideo for me) - worth a watch, so far. ~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
March 23, 2026

- Background
- I have lived in the city of Santa Cruz for 51 years. I’ve been deeply involved in local city politics for 45 years. I have served on two city commissions with three terms as chair. Most of my political work has been on the public side of the podium.
- Why run for Mayor?
- I decided to run for Mayor to take a stand against the rapid overbuilding of large projects that are overwhelming our infrastructure, our neighborhoods and our town. What we see now is just the beginning. Unless there is a change of direction at City Hall, the City of Santa Cruz will be unrecognizable in a few years.
- Overbuilding
- This city-driven overbuilding goes way beyond state housing requirements. The city approved the building of double the number of state-required housing units in the last eight-year cycle, mostly at the upper income levels. Those extra housing units do not count towards the current cycle, which runs from 2023-2031.
- Slow down!
- The city’s website shows that new large housing projects already submitted to the city, either approved or waiting for approval, total more than 4,000 additional housing units. This number exceeds the state-required 3,736 housing units for the entire eight-year cycle ending in 2031.
- No Overlay district
- The city has also proposed establishing a “ministerial approval overlay district.” This new district would encompass every buildable city parcel currently zoned mixed use or multi-family. Should this proposal pass, public hearings would be eliminated for all projects labeled one hundred percent affordable. This would give city planning staff sole authority to approve projects, without public oversight. The overlay district weakens current heritage tree protection criteria. It allows eight story projects deep into existing neighborhoods. This overreach is neither required by the state, nor necessary to reach our state housing numbers for the current eight-year cycle.
- Overbuilding & higher rents
- We cannot build our way into affordability.
More housing does not necessarily lead to lower rents. As more market rate housing is built, and more affluent people relocate to Santa Cruz, the income eligibility levels for affordable housing also rise since they are tied to the Area Median Income (AMI). As the AMI rises—it has risen 25% in 3 years—it leaves more low-income workers out of competition for affordable housing.
- Affordable housing: priority for local workers
- I am running to make absolute certain that affordable housing built in the city is offered first to local workers and local residents. The 2023-24 Civil Grand Jury, of which I was a member, published an investigative report titled “Housing for Whom?” The report documents that the city has no tracking system to ensure existing local preferences for affordable housing are being followed. If elected, I will work to make sure a tracking and verification system is in place, is followed and is audited. Our city by itself cannot provide affordable housing for the whole county and region. Priority must be given to local workers.
- Negative fiscal impact
- City planning staff has stated—and council has ignored—the fact that new housing results in a net negative fiscal impact over the long term. If the overbuilding continues, the cost of basic services will increase. Getting a doctor’s appointment will be more difficult. Dominican Hospital is overwhelmed right now. Costs for water, sewer and garbage will rise. Traffic congestion will get worse. Overcrowding has negative impacts for people, the infrastructure and the environment.
- State take-over of local control
- State housing laws have left cities with little control over their own land-use decisions. If elected, I will join other CA cities in pushing back against the state’s unsustainable housing requirements. Our state representatives must hear our concerns and better represent our interests.
- Housing built in the last 50 years
- Some claim that the city has built no housing for the past 50 years, that these new outsize buildings are just catch-up. That is incorrect. The US Census shows that since 1970; eleven thousand housing units have been built in the city. False claims to justify overbuilding should have no place in land-use decisions. As Mayor, I will base decisions on facts and evidence.
- Where is our money going?
- There has been a significant increase in the City’s top and middle management employees over the past three years. Padding at the top has in the long run bankrupted some CA cities. If elected, I will examine the ratio of supervisors to workers in the city to see if it aligns with similar cities in CA. I will scrutinize the over-hiring of consultants. I will ensure proper environmental review of projects to avoid unnecessary lawsuits that in the recent past have cost the city hundreds of thousands of dollars.
- The environment
- I am running to address environmental issues that have taken a back seat in the city’s priorities. We need to re-instate the ranger program in Parks and Recreation to keep our open space lands safe and clean. We are fast losing our heritage trees; three to four hundred are cut down with permit each year in our eleven square mile city. We can do better. We need to address light pollution, a proven human health risk with negative impacts on nocturnal animals, migrating birds and plant life.
- Small businesses
- If elected, I will support and protect our local small businesses. Too many are being forced out by the bulldozer. After displacement, few can afford the higher rents in the new projects. We are losing a sense of place as long-time local businesses disappear. I will protect our scarce industrial lands for future job growth.
- Community safety
- I worked as head of Rape Prevention Education at UCSC for thirty years. I know we can do a far better job of response to the high level of reported rape in the city, currently a buried issue. I will prioritize public safety in our parks.
I deplore the actions of ICE and will not support their presence in Santa Cruz.
- Leadership
- I am a skilled chair of public meetings. I respect all who work in the city at all levels. I respect all members of the public who attend city council meetings. I have a good rapport with current council members and am respected by city staff.
- Democratic process
- If elected, I would expand civic involvement by encouraging council members to hold regular constituent meetings in their districts. I would end the current requirement that council members can discuss an item only after a motion has been made. I view this requirement as stifling public debate among the council. It makes public comment largely superfluous since motions are pre-prepared with staff.
- My pledge
- If elected I will work with council members in a leadership role: to redirect staff away from overbuilding; to comply with state laws but no more; to push back against state take-over of local control; to protect our neighborhoods, our infrastructure and our environment with transparency and a more robust democratic process.
See and read more on the website: Greensite4Mayor.org

| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
Many thanks to Director David Baskin-Green for his common sense and clear-headed thinking at last Thursday’s MidCounty Groundwater Agency Board meeting to pause the action to continue having SCI Consultants devise methods to tax private well owners to get money to operate the State-mandated Agency.
Last year, on St. Patrick’s Day, the SCI Consultant rolled out his plan to a large room at Simpkins Center filled by private well owners, upset at the idea of being taxed for pumping water from their own wells. Nevertheless, the MGA and SCI Consultants moved forward with further analysis of possible future assessments.
A few of them were also at the MGA meeting last Thursday and spoke, or had written, opposing any future assessments on their private wells.
Representing the City of Santa Cruz, Director Baskin-Green immediately stated: “What is not equitable about the formula we’ve been using? I motion we continue this item and direct each agency’s executive director to discuss the existing funding formula with their respective governance Boards and return to the next [MGA] meeting with the results of their discussion and decision-making.” Director Susie O’Hare, also representing the City of Santa Cruz, agreed and added slight amendment. The vote to approve was nearly unanimous, with one no vote from the newest of the three Private Well Representatives, Keith Gudger.
Immediately, the Program Director, Tim Carson, announced the MGA would need to hire a facilitator to run the next meeting. Kerching, kerching…. Once again, the reasonable Director David Baskin-Green, joined by Director Marco Romanini (representing Central Water District) said “NO. We can manage our own discussion, just as we have here tonight.”
What a breath of fresh air!!
There are four jurisdictions working together to meet the State Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) planning and reporting requirements to ensure the MidCounty Groundwater Basin is taken care of in terms of quantity and quality of water available by 2040. Historically, the members pay proportionally to the amount of water pumped from the Basin. The jurisdictions agreed in 2017 during formation that each would fund it’s own projects, but would pay to maintain the necessary administration of the MidCounty Groundwater Agency itself. Soquel Creek Water District’s share is 70%, Central Water District pays 10%, the City of Santa Cruz pays 10% and the County of Santa Cruz (representing small water companies and other private well owners) pays !0%. That has worked well, despite causing some financial hardship for Central Water District, leading to a rate increase to pay that bill.
In 2022, MGA received a $7.6 million no-cost-share grant from the Dept. of Water Resources’ SGMA Implementation program to pursue
components of its Groundwater Sustainability Plan. More than $1.5 million of the 2022 award has funded compliance expenses for monitoring, reporting, and other activities…including consultants.
That allowed the member agencies to skip paying their share for the past couple of years, but not the grant money is mostly spent. Who knows if the State will be willing to fund more such grants.
The Staff Report begins on page 47, advising the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee to analyze the assessment options, followed by the Memorandum from the SCI Consultants further explaining the options.
The Memorandum outlines commonly used funding methodologies – including volumetric (extraction-based), land-based
(parcel or acreage), irrigated acreage, and hybrid approaches—and discusses considerations of
proportionality, equity, administrative feasibility, and legal defensibility.
Stay tuned for the next MGA meeting on June 18, 2026 in the Capitola Library Ow Community Room at 6pm.
Will the County convene a meeting with the private well owners before then? Send your thoughts on this matter to Ms. Sierra Ryan, the County’s executive on the Committee: Sierra Ryan < sierra.ryan@santacruzcontyca.gov > Under SGMA law, groundwater agencies can assess well owners to cover administration fees.
SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT BOARD RECOGNIZES LESS PUMPING
The Soquel Creek Water District Board heard a report last Tuesday that less pumping is needed, justifying their revision of baseline levels that influence tier funding rates. In 2020, that annual pumping volume was 3,900 AcreFeet, but due to customers using less water and finding leaks sooner, the District now anticipates 3,250 Acre-Feet/year fro the next five years, with actual current production at about 3,000Acre-Feet/year.
How will that affect the rates? That remains to be seen. Another rate study is in the works.
Read the Item 6.3 “Water Shortage Contingency” Staff Report. The website has been updated to assist with direct access to items via the left bar item access and is a great improvement!
WHAT IS POSSIBLE FOR SANTA CRUZ TRANSPORTATION?
With recent events regarding the Rail Trail issue, is anything salvageable for public transportation on the rail corridor and otherwise?
Plan to attend the panel discussion this Thursday, March 26 at the Resource Center for Non-Violence (612 Ocean Street, Santa Cruz) at 7pm.
A community conversation is needed about weaving these new technologies into our transportation tapestry. Santa Cruz Personal Rapid Transit (SCPRT), Silicon Valley Clean Cities Coalition (SVCCC), and LoopWorks areorganizing this public forum to discuss whether the promised value of adding robo-taxis and podcars is worth the expected costs.
Does Santa Cruz County need podcars?
Moderator: Stacy Hughes (RCNV trainer)
Panelists:
- Rob Means (LoopWorks, podcar advocate)
- Lani Faulkner (Equity Transit – Tránsito de Equidad)
- Elaine Johnson (Housing Santa Cruz County, NAACP Santa Cruz County Branch)
- Hannah Fairbairn (Vista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired)
- Matt Farrell (Friends of the Rail & Trail)
(Panelist speak as knowledgeable members of our community, not as official representatives of their organizations.)
Occupancy is limited to 200, so register to reserve a seat.
COUNTY SUPERVISORS ESTABLISH NEW YOUTH COMMISSION
The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors considered forming a new Youth Commission that will advise the Board on matters important to the youth in our Community. What a great idea to encourage youth to get involved in local government!
Chapter 2.127 would establish the Youth Commission. The purpose of the commission would be to serve in an advisory capacity to the Board by identifying emerging youth issues, providing input on policies and programs that affect young people, recommending policy improvements, and facilitating dialogue between youth and local government. The proposed Youth Commission would be composed of eleven (11) Santa Cruz County high school students ages 14-18. Each member of the Board would appoint one commissioner from their district, and six additional at-large members representing diverse lived experiences and perspectives within the community. These at-large positions are intended to help ensure representation from youth who may otherwise face barriers to civic participation. The membership would consist of the following members: Eleven (11) high school students between the ages of 14 and 18. Each member of the Board appoints one commissioner from their respective district (5 total). The Board will appoint six (6) at-large members from the following key stakeholder groups:
- Person of color
- Person with a physical or learning disability
- Person living in a rural or unincorporated area
- Person with an immigrant and/or farmworker family background
- Person who identifies as low-income
- Person who identifies as LGBTQ+
Let’s hope the Supervisors pay attention to the recommendations these young folks make. Remember, former CAO Carlos Palacios disbanded many such Community-based advisory commissions before he retired.
MAKING PROGRESS ON COUNTY SUPERVISOR CHAMBER REMODEL
Progress is seemingly slow but the remodeling work at the 701 Ocean Street Board of Supervisor Chambers is shaping up. What is not visible in the photos below is the significant pop-out media room. It seems to me that the public space will be less than before, but it remains to be seen.


When will it be done?
The Board calendar schedules one more meeting in the basement on April 14. What a shame that in all these months of having their meetings in different places, only two meetings have been held in Watsonville, with one of those at the expansive new South County Government Center at 500 Westridge Drive. Many people from Watsonville attended that meeting….but not at the other locations that have included Scotts Valley…when the Board approved moving forward with a Draft Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) that will greatly impact Watsonville residents.
By the way, the remodel also included a major re-do of the 5th floor women’s bathroom, too.
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. ATTEND A PANEL PRESENTATION ON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND ASK QUESTIONS.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers, and Happy Spring!
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
Is the adage ‘never talk about politics or religion in polite company’ still relevant? I was recently at a social gathering in Santa Cruz, surrounded by amazing, creative people, chatting about a variety of interesting subjects. One person I met had lived in the City for decades and recently moved a bit out of town. I asked them what they thought of the trajectory of downtown Santa Cruz – the pace and intensity of developments, the taller and taller buildings, whether they thought we were heading into an era of more affordable housing due to much more development, and how they thought more development would affect traffic and water supplies. As with everyone I’ve spoken with, they had grave concerns about the transformation of downtown, little faith that affordable housing would result, and were certain that traffic would get worse and water become scarcer. When I asked which politicians they saw as most responsible for pushing the downtown situation, their demeanor quickly changed. They had no idea. They had no opinion about Mayor Keeley. They said they lived in the County now and that City politics no longer concerned them. Disappointing! But maybe I should have taken the sage advice to stay out of such conversations.
City Politics IS Your Concern
It seems to me that most people are ready to talk national politics and ill-prepared to talk local politics. Cities have outsized impacts on large areas of the Earth. As the population becomes more and more concentrated in cities, people in those cities become more isolated from Nature. Those votes and the influence of the city elite and the politicians they often control means that cities are able to suck up water from way beyond their borders and dump their refuse into neighborhoods far away from city residents. Cities define where the roads go and how much traffic there is. After building their power and their donor base in the cities, city politicians often go into leadership at larger geographic scales. As much as all politics is local, most of politics is about your relationship with your most local city.
City Elections
The City of Santa Cruz is about to elect a new Mayor, and there is an interesting line up of candidates. As always, I encourage people to dig deeply into how each candidate has described their environmental platform. The City’s website is a good place to start for links for each candidate. We have Ryan Coonerty, who on his website has said ‘protect our greenbelt and parks.’ While Ryan says he is all about protecting parks, those of us who watched his proudly proclaimed work at making Cotoni Coast Dairies a part of a National Monument have to ask…how was that protecting anything? There is no evidence at all and much to the contrary. And, where was Ryan when a large area of Pogonip was going to be fenced and tilled for a non-profit farming adventure? How about the paving of Arana Gulch? What exactly does he mean by protecting Santa Cruz’ parks? With City streets flowing with pollutants into the Monterey Bay, with underfunded Parks unable to protect the numerous endangered species they oversee, and as overdevelopment stretches local water supplies, why has Ryan chosen such minute foci for his environmental platform? Check out the names on the list of endorsements – see any trends? Looks to me like a who’s who of who’s responsible for regional environmental destruction and overdevelopment of the City of Santa Cruz (with a few exceptions who I look forward to speaking with about this). Of note is that Coonerty is the only one running for mayor who declined the campaign expenditure limit: perhaps he is concerned about being on the ‘correct’ side of environmental destruction in order to look out for his donors’ business interests.
On the other hand, we are offered a number of other candidates including Ami Chen Mills, Chris Krohn, Joy Schendledecker, and Gillian Greensite. Many of us who have worked on environmental protection will recognize most of this lineup. Ami Chen Mills has a (draft?) website that presents a current environmental platform, albeit super-brief: “we must protect heritage trees, biodiversity and crucial ecosystems” and “Yes to protecting biodiversity, water and all life” as well as supporting a Very Important initiative ‘Rights of Nature Santa Cruz.‘ Joy Schendledecker’s website focuses mainly on climate change but includes protecting public land and “green space.” Gillian Greensite emphasizes housing issues, but also names park rangers, heritage trees, and light pollution in list of issues on her website. Chris Krohn’s website is not up yet, but those of us who know him have seen him do much good. Santa Cruz needs all of these candidates on the City Council if we are to have any water for fish, clean runoff, healthy greenbelt habitats thriving with even the most endangered of species, and a more open government that engages its citizens. I hope you join me in having discussions with our networks to elevate a pro-environment candidate to become Santa Cruz Mayor during the June 2nd election.
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Monday, March 23, 2026

Wikipedia provides the following definition of “TDS,” which I have used as my title, as seen above:
Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a pejorative term used to describe negative reactions to U.S. president Donald Trump that are characterized as irrational and disconnected from Trump’s actual policy positions. The term has mainly been used by Trump supporters to discredit criticism of him, as a way of reframing the discussion by suggesting that his opponents are incapable of accurately perceiving the world.
I thought I might make a brief comment on “Trump Derangement Syndrome” since I have been accused of being afflicted by it. Some of my Facebook Friends, too, who have made comments that ended up on my Facebook page, have also been called out as carriers of TDS.
As is so often the case, when arguments over issues of importance occur, accusing the “other side” of something that actually applies to you and “your side” is a well-proven way to defend oneself from criticism. For supporters of our current president to say that Trump critics are “incapable of accurately perceiving the world” is actually humorous, in a way, because a lot of the criticisms of our current president are based on the fact that he frequently says things that, seemingly, don’t actually square with reality – at least reality as most people perceive it.
If you click here, you will be transported to a brief, online comment from the BBC, the theme of which is that our current president has provided contradictory “mixed messages” about the war he started in Iran. I, personally, think it’s pretty accurate to say that these statements, and other statements made by our current president, do not accurately depict the world as the vast majority of the world perceives it. In other words, if there is any “derangement” in our relationship with the current president, the “derangement” is mostly on the president’s side.
I, however, don’t think it’s too helpful to argue about who is the most “deranged,” the president or his critics. To the extent we pursue that approach, we will find ourselves, on both “sides,” slipping around in an increasingly muddy pit full of accusations and responses.
I wrote about our current president in this blog back on January 21st, and suggested that “the people,” to whom the president is legally and constitutionally responsible, need to decide this question: Did we make a mistake in electing him to the presidency?
Back in January, when I published that earlier blog posting, our current president had not yet started a world-altering war with Iran. Now he has. Do we think that what our current president did was a mistake? If so, it was a huge and horrible one. If we think that choosing to begin that war was a mistake – based on what has happened since – then we need to take action to correct that mistake.
I’m suggesting that we – acting through our representatives in the United States Congress – need to deliberate on this question. Seriously! Was it a mistake for our current president to start a war with Iran without obtaining the authority and direction to do so, as the Constitution provides? Was it a mistake, and has that mistake had negative consequences for us (and for the world)?
If our current president’s unilateral action in starting a war with Iran was a huge and consequential mistake, would it make sense to put someone else in charge? The Constitution does provide a mechanism for us to do that, to correct such a mistake, if that’s what we decide it was!
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
Soon after President Trump and Pete Hegseth launched their “excursion” into Iran, a fundraising email was sent out to MAGA supporters, announcing a “massive and ongoing operation” against that country, with a warning that “Democrats want to see us divided.” It encouraged supporters not to “stay silent at this moment,” and to support Trump personally by supporting US troops in carrying out Trump’s new war. The email begins, “It’s Team Trump, and we’re asking every SINGLE Trump supporter who stands with President Trump and our brave US troops in carrying out this mission to let us know by signing the Official Trump Supporter List NOW.” You guessed it! The “supporter list” is a donation form to send cash for Trump’s campaign cash flow — and to support US troops in the process? Trump is calling attention to our military that he placed in harm’s way, in a supposed bipartisan duty, to link their deployment and military actions to his partisan cash grifting. Hardly ethical, you think?
This is all a part of a Trump call for “Team Effort,” as he asks other countries to help him secure the Hormuz Strait out of responsibility — to do their part to get him out of a jam. The US “decimated” Iran, so they owe us, but then failing to mention that the only thing decimated is the taxpayers’ wallets. The president has alienated other countries with his insults, his disrespectful comments, and has dismissed them and pushed them away with unfair tariffs to the point that his depravity disgusts them — a storm cloud in his own private Idaho, as Bocha Blue writes on the Palmer Report. Trying to turn things around isn’t working for him, as he had no plan to start with. His childlike confusion and misjudgment on tariffs broke the US economy which is now in worse shape with soaring gas prices, and consumer goods becoming less affordable as economic growth hits a downward spiral. And despite the ‘Help me!‘ sign he’s waving, even a red-tipped white cane and dark glasses will do Humpty Trumpy no good.
Bill Palmer says Trump appeared even dumber last week, when he attempted to highlight the fact that he gifted his cabinet members with new shoes — probably from a closeout sale, so sizing didn’t matter. Palmer mentions an interview the president did with Jake Paul, an actor and professional boxer, with an internet presence. Palmer says Paul is also famous for being an idiot, so the interview was likened to a Richard Nixon sit-down with the Three Stooges, who he reminds us were merely actors. In the interview, Trump claimed that as many as seventeen hundred Iranian sleeper cells existed in the US — news that we could have used sooner, exclaims Palmer — so, perhaps Trump, Noem, and Bovino could have used their thugs to smoke out the sleeper cells instead of rounding up Hispanic-looking people and murdering white onlookers. Palmer points to Benjamin Netanyahu for giving Trump the sleeper cell rumor, but that we shouldn’t worry regardless, with Jake Paul’s entry into the case.
Daily Dose of Democracy says the war has finished its third week with no end in sight, even with Trump asking for global ‘partners’ to help secure the Hormuz Strait against a “decimated Iran” to release oil tankers to guarantee the global energy supply. President ‘No New Wars’ Trump thumbed his nose at US intelligence, thanks to ‘Bibi’ Netanyahu, and threatening supposed close allies with an “or else” demand is getting him nowhere in cleaning up his mess. Former US allies are forming new partnerships without us because of the chaos, the instability, and the reckless handling of the Iran conflict. Recently Trump remarked that he would know the Iran war was over when he “feels it in his bones,” but we shouldn’t feel assured since he probably is waiting for his bone spurs to reappear.
Satirist Andy Borowitz offers his take on Trump’s Iran debacle: “Washington – Confirming the suspicions of many in the international community, on Monday Donald J. Trump revealed that intelligence played ‘no role’ in his decision to go to war with Iran. ‘People keep asking me about intelligence,’ he told reporters on Air Force One. ‘I made this call with no intelligence whatsoever. Quite frankly, every decision I’ve ever made in my life I’ve made without intelligence,’ he boasted. ‘Intelligence is for losers.’ Trump added that ‘I don’t trust people who have intelligence, which is why I love Pete.””
Australian Richard Quick posted on Quora: “Alright, this one’s for the MAGA crowd. Sit down, shut up, and pay attention because I’m only going to explain this once and I’m using small words so the flag emoji patriots can follow along. Your boy just let the International Energy Agency announce the biggest emergency oil release in its 50 year history. 400 million barrels. Pooled together from 32 countries. And your lot lost your collective minds like Daddy just saved the world. Let’s do the math that none of you peanuts can do: The world uses about 105 million barrels of oil a day. That means your big beautiful release is less than four days of global supply. That’s not a solution…that’s a long weekend. The entire IEA strategic reserve across all 32 countries is only 1.2 billion barrels, so this one release just burned through a third of the whole planet’s emergency safety net in one go. One crisis. One third of the cupboard…gone.”
Quick continues: “But it gets dumber. Keep up. The Strait of Hormuz is closed. Twenty percent of the world’s oil flows through that strait, right now none is moving. Citigroup estimates somewhere between 11 and 16 million barrels a day is being choked off the market. So even if you’re just trying to plug the gap from the strait, 400 million barrels buys you roughly a month. But it gets dumber. America’s share of this is coming from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which only holds 415 million barrels right now. That’s 58% of capacity because your guy never actually refilled the thing despite telling you he did. If the US shoulders the biggest chunk of this release, your tank is basically empty. And then what happens when the NEXT crisis hits? Because there’s always a next one.”
Quick’s post adds: “And the US can only physically pump oil out of the reserve at 4.4 million barrels a day, and it takes 13 days from a presidential order before a single barrel reaches the market. So even if they turned on the taps right now, the cavalry doesn’t arrive for two weeks and when it does it can’t keep up with the shortfall. Meanwhile the bloke who started the war that closed the strait in the first place is on local TV In Cincinnati going ‘we’ll reduce it a little bit then fill it up again,’ like he’s talking about the fuel tank on his golf cart. And you clapped. You actually clapped. This isn’t a rescue plan. It’s a press release designed to keep the stock market calm for 48 hours. A band-aid on an arterial bleed. Thirty two countries just torched a third of the world’s emergency oil supply because your president started a war he can’t finish, and if this drags past summer, the cupboard is bare, prices are in triple digits, and there is no Plan B. So, yeah champ, pop a Bud Light. Slap a bumper sticker on it. The adults are definitely in charge.”
HuffPost’s Lee Moran calls our attention to The New York Times‘ editorial board’s damning assessment of Trump’s false claims about the US-Israeli attack on Iran in an opinion piece that warns of the dangers of an ultimate backfire. There’s nothing new about the conflict in the president’s “stream of falsehoods,” since “Lying is standard behavior for Mr. Trump, of course,” the board suggests, noting the 30,000 misleading or untruthful claims from his first term as compiled by The Washington Post. The Times’ board argues that, “Lying about war is uniquely corrosive, creating a culture in which deadly mistakes and even war crimes can become more common, ultimately undermining American values and interests.”
The editorial board acknowledges, “There is reasonable debate to have about the wisdom of this war, given what is described as Iran’s ‘murderous’ government and threats to people at home and abroad. But Trump is not making that case, and is just lying about the reasons for the war and about its progress, in an attempt to disguise his poor planning and the war’s questionable basis.” Trump and his MAGA mob have given so many different answers for the various aspects of the incursion, what its actual objectives are, and how long it’s projected to last, that they’ve run out of fingers on which to count motives. Pointing to past conflicts, the board says that Vietnam and Iraq should have reminded leaders that falsehoods can boomerang on the perpetrators who tell them. “Whatever short-term gain Mr. Trump thinks he is getting by lying about the war in Iran is far exceeded by the cost to him, the country, and the world,” the Times concludes.
In one of his unhinged threats to Iran, last week Trump threatened to take out the country’s electrical grid and energy infrastructure “after 48 hours” if they didn’t capitulate and open the Hormuz Strait for oil tanker access. However, the threatened strikes were postponed when Trump announced that talks had made Iran “keen to make a deal.” “Major points of agreement” were said to have been reached, but Iran’s media poured cold water on the president’s announcement, saying there has been no “direct or indirect communication” between parties. After Trump’s post on social media, oil prices declined and the stock market responded positively, but many remained skeptical about the accuracy of the president’s comments. His claim that US envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner were in touch with “a top person” representing Iran for the backchannel talks — not Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.
President Trump claims that “regime change” is underway in light of the peace talks — an unidentified leader, Trump calling him “the most respected, and the leader,” who gets five days to produce results, or “we’ll just keep bombing our little hearts out.” Khamenei hasn’t been seen since he was selected to take his father’s place, and as far as his control goes, most believe the Revolutionary Guard are calling the shots. Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, says he has spoken to Hakan Fidan, his Turkish counterpart who has served as an intermediary in negotiations between Tehran and Washington, with Trump claiming that it’s difficult to find somebody to talk with since most of the Iranian leadership has been wiped out. John Byrne of Raw America says, “The question of whether this ends well for Iran is open. The US has significant military advantages it hasn’t fully deployed. But what isn’t open is whether this war is going the way Trump promised. It isn’t. And everyday the strait stays closed, Iran’s leverage grows.”
Anthony Davis on Substack, says Trump is demented and deluded, and thinks he’s hosting a reality show. Trump developed some “swagger in his real estate dealings, being performative, a little slippery, and often effective,” but that same instinct doesn’t transplant onto international diplomacy. “It doesn’t make you a savvy negotiator — it makes you unreliable, sometimes dangerously so,” says Davis. Therein lies the problem with Trump’s claims that the US is engaged in productive conversations with Iran, with Tehran’s complete denial of any talks. In a real estate deal or on a reality show such as The Apprentice, this might work, but right now, “those decisions are not abstract. The backdrop here is an active conflict: airstrikes, missile attacks, threats to obliterate infrastructure, and warnings of a regional escalation. In that environment, words are not cheap. They are signals. When a president says talks are underway and progress is being made, it suggests de-escalation,” observes Davis.
If those talks don’t exist, the signal is false — it’s destabilizing — and intermediaries trying to broker something real are left to clean up the narrative mess, and Iran has every incentive to dig in further rather than play along with a fiction resembling a reality TV show with no commercial breaks. Davis asserts, “Credibility, in this context, is currency. Not a moral virtue, not even trust in the traditional sense, but predictability. Other actors need to believe that when you say something publicly, it roughly corresponds to reality. That doesn’t mean full transparency — diplomacy often requires secrecy — but it does mean avoiding statements that are flatly contradicted by the other side. When that baseline collapses, every future statement is discounted.” It signals that there may be no real process at all, especially since Trump said just last week that we have no one to talk to since we’ve killed them all.
It is impossible to close a “deal” with a country that insists no deal is being discussed, and if those claims drift from the truth, the cost is embarrassment, confusion, miscalculation, and escalation. Davis concludes, “If there is a path out of a conflict as volatile as this one, it will to be paved with bravado. It will require quiet channels, verifiable steps, and a level of message discipline that resists the urge to declare victory before a conversation has even begun. Anything less isn’t negotiation. It’s performance — and Trump just wants to be the star of the show.”
Even without a resolution on the Iran war, Trump is rubbing his hands together about his next target. Talking to reporters, he said, “Cuba’s a failed nation. Cuba also wants to make a deal and I think we will pretty soon — make a deal or do whatever we have to do. I think something will happen with Cuba pretty quickly.” Being cut off from its oil supply from Venezuela which is now under US control, the country has had rolling blackouts and suspended air links. Cuba has been existing under a 1960s embargo emplaced by the US, with only hit and miss support from Russia or China, so Trump is ready to carry out a “friendly takeover” of the island as a neighborly gesture to ease their pain — and find Castro’s stash of gold. Thom Hartmann of Raw America says, “We need to understand what’s really happening here. It’s not just foreign policy. It’s a pattern of a president who’s discovered he can use military force without consequence, without congressional pushback, and without a media willing to challenge him. Once a democracy lets that become normal, it’s very hard to walk it back.” See you in C-U-B-A!
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |

Thomas is traveling and forgot to bring his book. He’ll be back!

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“Precision”
“Don’t go in for the “yellowish” if what you need is “yellow”. The attitude called precision is the quality that remarks the accuracy of your demand. Never settle for the less; Go for the exact thing!”
~Israelmore Ayivor
Be precise. A lack of precision is dangerous when the margin of error is small.
~Donald Rumsfeld
Concision in style, precision in thought, decision in life.
~Victor Hugo
In football as in watchmaking, talent and elegance mean nothing without rigour and precision.
~Lionel Messi
Commas in The New Yorker fall with the precision of knives in a circus act, outlining the victim.
~E. B. White
|
How things work is something that has fascinated me my whole life. I love things that are nifty and clever, and boy does a zipper qualify! Enjoy this video – and any video from Veritasium, for that matter. |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

March 11 – 17, 2026
Greensite… on running for Mayor… Steinbruner… Work on Aptos Bridge… Hayes… A Cotoni Coast Dairies update… Patton… Landlords Are Not The Problem?… Matlock… trapped…nosering…church picnic…dug in… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… ADHD diagnosis in the Holderness family Quotes on… “ADHD”
|
|
If you want to pitch in to |
CHECK OUT THE VIDEO FOR THIS WEEK. The Holderness Family are Penn and Kim Holderness, who make really funny parody videos, a little like Weird Al. Theirs are more about their lives, I think, like family and holidays and aging, etc etc. The first one of theirs I remember seeing was their thanksgiving mashup video from ten years ago (how?!?!?!), with the unforgettable hook of Watch me sip my Chardonnay nay, featuring Kim, somewhat unhinged, drinking wine in the woods. They’ve only gotten better as the years have passed, and I guess now they have a podcast (Laugh Lines) as well. This week’s video is from that podcast, namely Kim announcing that she’s been formally diagnosed with ADHD, and subsequent discussion.
As a woman with ADHD, diagnosed late (LATE) in life myself, I relate to soooo many of the things she mentions in this video: imposter syndrome, time blindness, perfectionism, etc etc etc. Personally, one of the things I have the hardest time with is when people express that they think that I “use my ADHD as an excuse”. If you’ve ever had that feeling towards someone, please watch this video, or some other material about it. That’s really not a thing.
Since this column went up so late, the next one is coming in a couple of days!
~Webmistress
SCARPETTA. Prime. Series. (5.9 IMDb)
This series is about a noted Medical Examiner (Kidman) investigating a murder tied to a string of killings from 25 years ago.
Wait—no. It’s about sibling rivalry that apparently has no expiration date (Kidman/Curtis).
Then again, it’s about the adult niece of a Medical Examiner who can’t let go of her deceased wife and builds an AI replacement.
Any one of these might’ve made for an interesting series—just not all at once. Good cast, so-so mystery, and way too much going on. Pick a lane.
~Sarge

A MURDER BETWEEN FRIENDS. Prime. Movie. (3.5 IMDb)
Half a point for being in focus. Joan Collins fronting for a series – at least according to the end card. Six… “people,” I guess… reunite at an Airbnb “castle” owned by a legendary mystery writer, played by Joan Collins. One of them ends up floating in the hot tub. That’s about it.
Everyone treats Joan Collins as a full-blown Mary Sue: “You’re a great mystery writer – we should all listen to you.” What does she actually do? Watch security cameras that most of the cast already know about, while they continue misbehaving anyway.
It’s embarrassing to watch, especially since I’m reasonably sure she bankrolled it. Not worth a watch. Stand well back. Mind the gap. Go watch “Agatha Christie’s 7 Dials” on Netflix.
~Sarge
THE LAST KIDS ON EARTH. Netflix. Series (1hr pilot). (7.2 IMDb) ![]()
This largely bloodless animated series began with a pilot-style special and ran for two seasons. It’s based on the children’s book series by Max Brallier, with character designs inspired by the illustrations of Douglas Holgate.
The story follows orphan Jack Sullivan as he adjusts to life after an invasion of extra-dimensional monsters and a zombie apocalypse. He soon bands together with a scrappy group of kids who missed the evacuation – along with a loyal monster-dog – forming their own ragtag survival team.
Aimed primarily at the 8–12 crowd, the show still has enough sharp humor and creature-feature flair to entertain adults. The voice cast includes Nick Wolfhard (brother of Finn), Mark Hamill, Keith David, Catherine O’Hara, and Rosario Dawson. Worth a watch – with or without your kids.
~Sarge
AGATHA CHRISTIE’S SEVEN DIALS. Netflix. Series. (6.2 IMDb)
There have been a fair few non-Poirot/Marple adaptations recently, and this is certainly one of them.
The cast is solid – Martin Freeman is great, and Mia McKenna-Bruce really shines in the lead role (though Helena Bonham Carter kind of phones in a stock twitchy character). The film doesn’t quite hook you into the mystery, though. It’s not slow, just… not all that engaging. The highlight for me was definitely Mia jumping out of a window to dodge a wedding proposal. On the plus side, it’s only 3 episodes. Many clocks.
It’s probably worth a watch if you’re looking for something to pass the time before the next episode of your favorite show drops.
~Sarge
THE MUPPET SHOW. Disney+. Series. (8.4 IMDb) ![]()
Or, as I like to think of it, ANTI-MELANIA. They both star a woman who is completely self-obsessed, clinging to a less attractive mate’s position: I mean, of course, the return of … THE MUPPET SHOW!
That’s right, the same old gang at the same old theatre. Minus the legendary Jim Henson and Frank Oz (who is still alive, at time of writing), it actually defies the concern of losing the magic – it’s almost like it never ended. Which is a good thing. Only one episode so far, but it’s off to a good start. Worth a watch!
~Sarge
LA BELLE ET LA BÊTE (1946). Disney+, Max. Movie. (7.4 IMDb) ![]()
Just ran back across this amazing version of Beauty and the Beast (literally haven’t watched it since the early 90’s), with amazing magical settings, and honestly a beast you like so much more than the Prince underneath. There are a number of visuals that have found their way into other lesser films. Jean Marais literally smolders in his cat-like beast. In French with English subtitles. Ça vaut le détour.
~Sarge
RIOT WOMEN. BritBox. Series. (8.5 IMDb)
In the early ’90s, a musical revolution erupted – one part punk, many parts feminism – spearheaded by bands like Bikini Kill and Bratmobile (<3): "Riot Grrrl". It laid the foundation for bands like L7 and Hole, whose raw energy and unapologetic attitudes reshaped rock music. Fast forward 35 years, and those fierce grrrls are now navigating the challenges of menopause. Enter Riot Women, a series that follows a group of "women of a certain age" who've had it up to here with hot flashes and feeling invisible. What starts as a joke quickly transforms into something more: they decide to start their own band. While only a few episodes are currently available on BritBox (released weekly), the show's got heart, humor, and plenty of punch. If you've ever felt overlooked or dismissed, Riot Women is a riotous reminder that it's never too late to reclaim your voice. Available exclusively on BritBox (via PrimeVideo for me) - worth a watch, so far. ~Sarge
COVER-UP. Netflix. Movie. (7.5 IMDb)
I was all of eight years old when I first heard about William Calley and the massacre at My Lai. No details, just that someone had destroyed a village. For years I assumed it was a bombing: distant, impersonal. I was today years old when I finally learned just how VERY up-close and personal it actually was. I’ve experienced true tunnel vision only twice in my life. This made it the third.
“Cover-Up” is an extraordinary first-hand (self-)account of the life and career of Seymour Hersh, a journalist hip-deep in some of the most damning exposés of the last half-century – from My Lai to Watergate to Abu Ghraib.
Fair warning: the first quarter focuses on My Lai, and the images and descriptions are brutal enough to send you – perhaps not for the first time – into the streets to protest the Vietnam War.
This is the biography of an irascible reporter who will stop at nothing – for better or worse – to get at the truth. It’s deeply uncomfortable viewing, and absolutely worth it.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
March 9, 2026

As you might have read in last week’s issue, I have thrown my hat in the ring and am running for Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz. The photo above of the current council and Mayor will have at least one change at the end of this year and possibly three. Mayor Keeley is ending his four-year term and has not filed for a second term; council members Scott Newsome and Renee Golder are both running for re-election and both face challengers to their seats.
So, why am I running for Mayor? I’ve lived in the city of Santa Cruz for 51 years. For 46 years, I’ve been actively involved in local politics at the city council level, and with few exceptions, always on the public side of the podium. I’ve experienced how public input is regarded at city hall; have watched closely how decisions are made; have observed the various mayors, how they run meetings and set the agenda. And then there’s the upper management staff. Do they follow policies set by council? Or does the tail wag the dog? With all this experience, I’d like a chance to be on the decision-side of the podium.
I’ve brought many issues before the various councils. The first issue in 1981 involved evaluating the city’s response to rapes reported to the Santa Cruz Police Department (SCPD). This focus evolved from my position as founder of Rape Prevention Education on campus. I was hired by UCSC in 1979 to establish and head this brand-new program, which I did for 30 years. Taking the issue into the community in the 1980’s, led to an organizing drive to put the issue on the ballot. This effort led to the then council adopting the ordinance rather than it going to a public vote. This Ordinance 81-29 mandated the formation of a city commission, the Commission for the Prevention of Violence Against Women. I was appointed by council as a commission member and its first chair. My immediate task was to read and evaluate two years of reported rapes, about 48 redacted reports in all. The results were of grave concern. The quality of investigations was inadequate on many levels. I wrote up recommendations and waited for council to act. I’m still waiting. Fast forward to 2023-24 when I served a year on the Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury. One of the investigative topics included an analysis of rapes reported to the SCPD and the city’s handling of the issue. Deja Vue. The current council’s response was a repeat of the council from the mid 1980’s. Apparently, a tourist town does not want rape to be publicly aired.
Other issues that have brought me to city hall on the public side of the podium include the major effort by a small community group, Don’t Morph the Wharf! to stop the city turning the Santa Cruz Municipal Wharf into a Pier 39. Other issues include trying to protect our remaining heritage trees, an effort so far with few successes. I have some ideas on how to change that result. Of course, a mayor is only one of seven; work needs to be collaborative and respectful of staff. But undemocratic patterns have set in and are rarely challenged.
A common pattern at city hall is to prepare and try to defend wholly inadequate environmental reviews of major projects. The public is routinely ignored, leaving the only option to file a lawsuit, which the city usually loses, squandering large amounts of public monies. I believe this pattern can and should be changed.
Speaking of money, from the perspective of 46 years, I note a recent city trend of accelerated hiring at the top management levels, including a plethora of consultants, leaving the boots on the ground workers lean and spread thin. I saw this happen at UCSC over 30 years and now the city on a hill is in the red. The same thing will happen at the city level if this trend continues. Retirement of highly paid public servants can bankrupt a city.
Council members now have districts. I would recommend regular in-person meetings between individual council members and their constituents. Not just a wandering around a room to chat with department heads or put sticky notes on a board but proper town hall meetings.
The biggest issue I see right now is the rampant overbuilding in the city and the gutting of the established built landscape, the loss of a sense of place. Why is this happening; who benefits; what are the myths that keep us acquiescent? I’ll explore more of this next week.
In the meantime, if you are keen to volunteer to help move my campaign forward, email me at greensiteformayor@gmail.com.
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
Because Chair of the Board Monica Martinez pulled Consent Agenda item #25, a lively debate resulted in good public information at last Tuesday’s Board of Supervisor meeting.
Thanks to the good work and sharp eyes of the public, it was discovered via Public Records Act request materials that the State Housing and Community Development (HCD) made an error in the date on a letter certifying the County’s Housing Element that allowed three developers to file applications for significant projects under Builder’s Remedy.
Consent Item #25 was pulled to become Regular Agenda Item 9.1, to more closely examine this action:
Direct the Board Chair to send a letter to the Director of the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) requesting that HCD issue a clarification letter confirming that Santa Cruz County’s Housing Element was determined to be in substantial compliance as of March 15, 2024, when HCD completed its substantive review, and take related actions.”
I am reprinting the portion of the Staff Report on this, because it is tricky to find on the Board of Supervisor website, but it truly merits reading…
Discussion
On November 14, 2023, the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors adopted the County’s 2023–2031 Housing Element and authorized the Director of Community Development and Infrastructure to make non-substantive revisions necessary to obtain certification from HCD. The revised Housing Element was submitted to HCD on February 23, 2024, following a required seven-day comment period. The County received HCD’s formal written certification letter on April 23, 2024. That letter was subsequently re-issued and backdated to April 12, 2024, after HCD acknowledged an earlier administrative error related to the County’s Housing Element deadline.During the period between the completion of HCD’s review and the issuance of the formal certification letter, several developers submitted preliminary applications invoking the “Builder’s Remedy” provision of state housing law. These include proposed projects at 841 Capitola Road, 3500 Paul Sweet Road, and Graham Hill Road. Builder’s Remedy allows certain housing projects to ignore local zoning and General Plan requirements if a jurisdiction does not have a Housing Element in substantial compliance with state law at the time of application.
Documents obtained by residents through Public Records Act (PRA) requests indicate that HCD completed its substantive review of the Housing Element by March 15, 2024 (Attachment A) and verbally informed County staff that the document was ready for certification. Internal communications further indicate that no additional substantive review occurred after that date. However, the official certification letter was not received until April 23, 2024, and was not due to inaction by the County, but rather due to delays caused by HCD.
Based on the emails that were received through a community public records request, it is clear that the County acted in good faith to meet the deadlines set forth by HCD and complied with making any necessary revisions in a timely manner to avoid Builders Remedy. Because the County made a good faith effort and email correspondence indicates that the County was in compliance as of March 15, 2024, the Board Chair is directed to request that HCD backdate certification of Santa Cruz County’s Housing Element to March 15, 2024, with a determination that the County was in substantial compliance, or provide clarification as to why we were not in compliance as of March 15th, given the information provided by HCD via PRA. This action would help resolve ongoing legal and policy questions regarding the applicability of Builder’s Remedy to these projects and provide clearer guidance for future land use decisions
What amazed me was the long discussion between Supervisors, with Chair Monica Martinez making a motion delay any action to send a letter to HCD to correct the date on the Housing Element compliance letter. County Counsel Jason Heath did a good job of scaring the Supervisors into worry about lawsuits from the developer of the 841 Capitola Road project that has already been approved under the Builder’s Remedy restrictions on the County. He emphasized that the developer has spent alot of money on the project.
I was happy to hear Supervisors Cummings and Koenig push back with a second motion to send the letter to HCD right away, and stand up to protect the Community’s interests rather than bowing to the developers. Supervisor Koenig also eloquently supported that intent.
Members of the public in the audience who had brought forth this issue, with support from Senator Laird and Assemblymembers Addis and Pellerin, sighed with relief when the Board voted 4:1 to approve sending the letter to HCD to request correcting the date on the Housing Element Certification of Compliance, much to the seemingly disgruntled County Counsel Heath’s dismay. Chair Martinez was the lone dissenting vote.
What is Builder’s Remedy, anyway? Take a look here.
Listen to the amazing discussion on Item 9.1 beginning at about Minute 2:46:00
As a “PS” to this report, the amendment to the Housing Element made by the Planning Department Director was to allow ministerial or “by right” development (no discretionary public hearings) of 70+ parcels rezoned to allow “ developers of those parcels will have the option to pursue multi-family housing development on a ministerial basis as required by the new statutory language, if the developer is providing 20% of the total units in the project as deed-restricted lower-Income units. One way to achieve that would be to add those additional parcels to the by-right or ministerial overlay zone described in Program H-1C, which applies to seven parcels in the inventory, as indicated by the “-Min” designation next to those parcels in Table 7 of Appendix HE-E (see attached). Staff’s preliminary analysis of this requirement concludes that approximately 27 additional parcels would be eligible for inclusion in the ministerial overlay zone, beyond the seven already flagged as such in the adopted element. The parcels are needed to fill the lower-income “RHNA gap” through rezoning (Program H-1B).”
This was the Board of Supervisor action that will now allow ministerial approval of the seven-story apartment building and 197 townhomes in Aptos, identified as the “Village on the Green” on the County’s Major Projects.
DO YOU SUPPORT ALLOWING HIGHER SALES TAX?
It sure was refreshing to hear Supervisor Koenig read aloud a section from the County’s General Fund Budgeting Principles when the Board was asked in Consent Agenda Item #19 to support Senator Laird’s tailor-made bill for the County to allow going skirting around ballot measures causing unconstitutionally-high sales tax levels.
Listen in at Minute 43:00
Here is what the Board voted to support…but with the addition of the County’s Budget Policy to not spend more than it has.
Senate Bill (SB) 1078 (Laird) would allow the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors to ask voters to approve a countywide transactions and use tax of up to 0.5% above California’s current 2% statutory cap on local sales taxes. The bill is needed because all local jurisdictions count toward the statutory cap, and some jurisdictions are within 0.5% of the cap.
SB 1078 does not impose a tax or authorize a vote. It merely gives the Board the authority to authorize a vote. The authority would expire on December 31, 2030.
Discussion
SB 1078 provides the County with a pathway to fiscal flexibility. California law currently limits combined local sales taxes to 2% above the statewide base rate. In jurisdictions that have reached this cap, counties cannot ask voters to approve additional local sales taxes unless the California Legislature grants an exemption. SB 1078 would create such an exemption specifically for Santa Cruz County. These kinds of exemptions have been used in other jurisdictions, and other counties are currently pursuing them to address the extraordinary challenges presented by H.R. 1.Without new revenue tools, significant reductions in programs and services are likely to occur. SB 1078 does not raise taxes and simply authorizes the County to place a measure before voters.
Here is that County Budget Policy Supervisor Koenig referenced:
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL GENERAL FUND BUDGETING PRINCIPLES
FIREFIGHTERS DONATE $150,000 TO HELP REPLACE A CRITICAL WATER TENDER
Many thanks to the South Skyline Firefighters for donating $150,000 to help Santa Cruz County Fire Department purchase a new 3,000-gallon water tender for protecting the rural summit area. The existing apparatus is aged, and a new one costs $675,657.79. It is curious that the County Service Area (CSA) 48 assessments do not seemingly cover the full cost, as the 2020 Benefit Assessment report to property owners promised.
Many thanks to Supervisor DeSerpa for publicly recognizing the donation that will make a new water tender for rural Santa Cruz County Fire Department in areas that have limited water for fire suppression.
Let’s hope that the current CEO Nicole Coburn does not delay the ordering of this new water tender for the summit area. Historically, CAO Susan Mauriello sat on the funds made available by the Loma Prieta Fire supporters’ donations, delaying for three years the release of funds and order of the new water tender for their community. It took bold public action by the County Fire Chief to finally force her to procure the new water tender, because their existing one was not functional and the public’s safety was at risk.
WORK AT THE APTOS CREEK BRIDGE
For the past few weeks, PG&E crews have assembled scaffolding and have been working under the Aptos Creek Bridge, sometimes accompanied by a security guard stationed on the bridge. Hmmm…what is going on?
A quick stop and conversation with a PG&E worker at the site let me know that the crews are sandblasting the 16″ diameter natural gas pipeline attached under the bridge as part of their maintenance program. Once sandblasted, ultrasound testing will determine the pipe wall thickness integrity for further inspection and eventual re-coating. It is a tricky job, the fellow said, because all sandblasting material must be suctioned away so as not to land in Aptos Creek, per Fish and Wildlife orders.
Whew! Who would know such a large gas pipeline was there? Let’s hope that all goes well on the pipe that seemingly was installed when the Aptos Creek Bridge was built in 1928….nearly 100 years ago.

Scaffolding and access stairs for the critical work happening at the Aptos Creek Bridge.
HOW CAN YOU KNOW WHEN A BIG PROJECT IS PLANNED FOR YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD?
I recently interviewed Mr. Lee Butler, Director of Planning for the City of Santa Cruz, to discuss what some consider to be shocking changes in the downtown developments. You can
listen to that February 27 interview (hour #2) here
Some listeners later asked how can people know when a big project is planned for their neighborhood, and how can they keep apprised of the proceedings as the permit process moves along?
Mr. Butler sent the excellent explanation, featured below.
The best way for people to find out about large projects early in the process is to sign up for email alerts. From our website (www.SantaCruzCA.gov), there is a blue and white “Stay Connected” tab at the bottom right. You can sign up for email alerts there. There’s also a link at the very bottom of the homepage. See below for instructions:
- Community member can sign up to stay updated from the website (very bottom)
- Then they can select the topics. We have for project specific for “significant projects” and “Community Development Updates”, along with the commissions.
- Then as a follow up, after a new project page is created, then . This is new / different from the previous platform of GovAccess notifications.
Many thanks to Mr. Lee Butler for this information.
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. SIGN UP TO FOLLOW A PERMIT APPLICATION FILED IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
It has been a while since I gave an update on Cotoni Coast Dairies, but I have previously written much about that piece of (unfortunately) federally-owned ‘conservation’ land on Santa Cruz County’s North Coast. In August 2025, BLM staffer Zachary Ormsby had a chance to address the public about the parkland. Here, I present additional perspectives including some more recent developments.
Ch-ch-ch-Changes!
A year ago, as many of us had predicted, the Federal government made yet another of its radical political shifts, affecting the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which oversees Cotoni Coast Dairies. Just before that transition, California’s BLM director changed. Karen Mouritsen, a Trump appointee who had lasted most of the 4 years of the Biden Administration, had been pressing to maximize public access and denying any funding to take care of the land’s pressing invasive species, wildfire, and erosion issues. Then, in 2024, Joseph Stout was appointed head of the California BLM; Joe had previously been deputy director of BLM but mysteriously left for most of Karen Mouritsen’s term. At the start of their term, the Trump Administration fired the national head of BLM and, as of March 1, 2026, has yet to replace them. Nevertheless, the leaderless BLM has turned its already understaffed offices to resource extraction rather than conservation. The staff in our BLM region now spend much of their time advertising, negotiating, and monitoring leases to extract oil. Luckily, the nonprofit conservation organization Trust for Public Land, which signed the land over to BLM, restricted the property deed, prohibiting oil extraction.
Public Access
Public access is a little less extractive to open space than pumping oil out of the ground, and usually less toxic. Visitor use of natural areas has long been recognized as one of the top threats to species, globally. Nevertheless, at Cotoni Coast Dairies, an area set aside primarily for conservation, BLM (in close partnership with mountain biking sports advocates) has begun development of an extensive trail network through globally significant threatened habitats, disrupting and possibly displacing endangered wildlife species. Sole source government contracts paid these mountain bikers hundreds of thousands of dollars to organize volunteers in transforming a little-known virgin wildland into a recreational park. The nine miles of new trails emanate from a 90-car parking lot replete with two restrooms and a few interpretive signs. Although the park is open sunrise to sunset, the gate to the parking lot is open all of the time. Despite promises to the contrary, the restrooms are locked weekdays even though there are lots of visitors filling the parking lot. The interpretive signs have minimal interpretation of nature but lots of rules. If you don’t speak English, you better have a smart phone (and reception!) if you want to translate the signs, which don’t present even Spanish language translations. One of the rules is to stay on the marked trails, but there are well worn and often-used roads that aren’t labeled for access but frequently used by mountain bikers. The trails are too narrow and the sides too steep to accommodate mountain bikers comfortably passing hikers. During a recent visit, I experienced a mountain biker who was furious about being interrupted from bombing down the trail…there was nowhere to get off the trail– after a wave of explicatives, red faced and loud, the biker stumbled past me, his embarrassed girlfriend trailing. But, pedestrians far outnumber the barnstorming bikers who are no doubt made all the more angry because their volunteer work hasn’t panned out for their unimpeded high-speed endorphin-laden ‘rad times.’ Such glowering is occasionally interrupted by the too-frequent trailside plastic tacky signs profusely gushing about the generosity of mountain biking volunteers for everything the visitor might experience.
“Innovative” Cattle Grazing
One of the mandates for BLM at Cotoni Coast Dairies was changing the historic livestock regimes to something more innovative and natural resource protection oriented. Up went super expensive high-tech antennae. Cattle were fitted with electronic shock collars designed to train them into grazing within ‘invisible fences.’ Innovative, indeed – especially if there was a grazing PLAN (there isn’t)! As of Spring 2026, this technology remains innovative in one way only: convincing the public that something innovative is happening with the livestock program: otherwise, no one has turned on the switches to make the system active. However, innovative livestock management isn’t the only thing lying dormant on the landscape…
Science-Based Land Management
At the apex of conservation lands are National Monuments, which (logically!) must publish science strategies to support their (also mandated) Management Plans. Being one of many units of the California Coastal National Monument, Cotoni Coast Dairies has such a science strategy underway (or maybe even published and not publicly available) with the help of experts at the US Geologic Survey.
Along with such science-based strategies, BLM is required to update its California Special Status Animal Species list every 5 years. The last one was published in 2019 and the most recent update was due in 2024. Where is it? Not on their website. Have they, as required, worked with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to collaboratively develop that updated list? Who knows? One thing of interest…the mountain lions on the Central Coast have recently been listed as Endangered by the State of California. As such, pumas should receive priority protection by BLM at Cotoni Coast Dairies, applying Dr. Wilmers’ (UCSC) research findings indicating the importance of protecting large areas from any human visitation whatsoever and planning for wide, forested movement corridors. The emphasis here is on forested areas, which on Cotoni Coast Dairies are being threatened by French broom invasion.
Broom Farming
The BLM at Cotoni Coast Dairies has been officially recognized for their expertise in French broom farming by the Invasive Species Agricultural Association (ISAA). President Rex Fowler, in awarding the distinguished prize noted, “BLM has exceeded expectations both in fostering the health of, and increasing the spread of, the dreaded and most pernicious invasive species French Broom. We look forward to marveling at extensive fields of this excellently invasive pest for generations to come.”
Hillsides of once diverse prairies, stands of majestic coast live oaks, and ridgelines of coastal scrub and maritime chaparral are being overrun by monocultures of French broom at Cotoni Coast Dairies. With a seedbank that lasts 40+ years, the scope of any eventual control program is expanding rapidly. BLM managers’ unsubstantiated smokescreen for corrupt, self-serving sole-source contracts with mountain bikers for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on visitor use access was the proclamation that ‘there shall be no land management until visitors are flooding the park.’ Well folks – what now? Visitors are flooding the park! Now we hear ‘we must drill baby drill!’
What Next?
There is an opportunity in the current Administration to solve this mess. What?! How so?? The Federal government has been murmuring about dumping federal property: why not give it back? Back to who? How about the Amah Mutsun? California’s land back movement is gaining momentum. Let’s give the land back to the tribal people! Why not?
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Tuesday, March 10, 2026

We are in the midst of a housing crisis. At least, most people would say that – and certainly people in my own hometown of Santa Cruz, California. Binyamin Appelbaum, who is the lead writer on economics and business for The New York Times‘ editorial board, wants to assure us that “Landlords Are Not The Problem.”
They’re not? Well, no; they’re not “the” problem; let’s admit it. While some affordable housing advocates would probably disagree – and would have some good points to make – there isn’t, really, some greed-driven National League of Landlords whose sole purpose in life is to make sure that their rentals cost more than those needing housing can afford.
Still, look at the first few paragraphs of Appelbaum’s recent column, and then think about the way he defines the issues (emphasis added):
President Trump relishes a handy scapegoat and, on Wednesday, he picked one to blame for the nation’s housing crisis: investors that are buying large numbers of single-family homes and operating them as rental properties.
Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social that he was taking steps to prevent such purchases as part of a broader program to make homes affordable again. He said that “people live in homes, not corporations.” He said he’d provide more details in two weeks, when he visits Davos, a Swiss ski resort not known for its affordable housing.
But there’s no need to wait for the details. Landlords are not the cause of the nation’s housing crisis, and any plan that reduces investment in housing is only going to make matters worse.
Appelbaum says that the actual problem is easily understood as an issue of “supply and demand.” According to Appelbaum, building more housing is the answer:
The problem is that the United States does not have enough housing. The hard part is building more. It is certainly easier, and perhaps better politics, to talk about barring investors, or imposing rent controls, or kicking immigrants out of the country, but none of that is going to do the trick. The way to make housing more affordable is to build more housing (emphasis added).
Again, it’s hard to disagree with Appelbaum’s statement. Clearly, building more housing, if that lowered the price, would help solve the problem. However, as I have revealed above, I live in Santa Cruz, California, which has tried to solve its affordable housing crisis by “building more” – and LOTS more has been built, and lots more is in the process of construction. Has the crisis been eliminated? Has the increase in “supply” lowered the price?
The short answer seems to be a very clear: “NO.” Here’s another question, and it’s related: based on our local experience, has the “building more” solution even improved our situation? I believe that most local residents would say (or, more correctly, “admit”) that the housing crisis in our community has not been improved by the very significant increase in housing “supply” that has been foisted upon the community by those who claim that “more housing” means more “affordable housing” – and that specifically includes the California State Legislature and our Governor, who have virtually eliminated local decision-making over land use. Has turning decisions about housing construction to those who want to build “more” led to more “affordable” housing? Nope! Hasn’t been working in my hometown.
In fact, to refocus on Appelbaum’s column, those investors who are buying large numbers of single-family homes and then operating them as rental properties, are, effectively, kicking out lower-income people to make housing available to higher-income people. In other words, they are, in fact, helping to cause our housing crisis, as our current president suggests. To remember something from my blog posting yesterday, this is a particularly anguishing example of how “private equity” impoverishes, rather than enhances, our overall economic situation.
Locally, our so-called “median income” is escalating rapidly. That is a feature of the “housing crisis” that everyone admits exists. As people with higher incomes become those who can afford to rent or buy, the “affordable housing” programs that tie housing assistance to “median income” become less and less effective to help lower income, working people.
To eliminate the crisis, we need to make housing “more affordable,” and simply building more housing doesn’t, in any direct way, have such a price-reducing impact. Maybe some economics course in high school or college told us that when supply is increased the price (inevitably) goes down, but even if that might be true “theoretically,” this isn’t what is happening in our “real world.” What is happening is that the process hailed by Appelbaum is driving out those people who can only afford a housing payment that is 30% or less of the income they receive. And they don’t make enoough in their local employment to pay the rent, or to purchase a home. “More” is not equal to “better,” because “more” does not mean “more affordable.”
“Landlords” are not the problem. That’s what Appelbaum says. Ok. Let’s agree. But let’s also agree that it is “the system” that is the problem. Building more housing doesn’t make housing more affordable unless the price is, somehow, “controlled.” Why is that? Well, in Santa Cruz, there is a much greater demand for housing (it’s a really nice place to live) than there are local folks who can afford the rents (or the purchase price of any new homes constructed). Our current president’s plan, as sketched in by Appelbaum, actually would help reduce prices, which might actually help.
I think that there was a time (post World War II) when housing was seen as a place for families to live, and not as an “investment.” That time has passed. It passed long ago, too. As I was growing up, in Palo Alto, California, my parents moved the family five times. They bought their first home, and then they always sold for more than they had paid, and then moved on to an even nicer place, and that was an “income strategy.” My parents were very clear about that. Buying a home for its investment potential, not (only) for its value as a home, made perfect sense. In fact, “investing” in a home was a “good” investment. Whatever the purchase price, the “selling” price, a few years later, was always more. That is still what’s happening. “Housing” is a good “investment.” Well, most working people aren’t “investing” to produce income for themselves and their family, they’re working for it. And working people are making less, and they can’t keep up with the prices based on those who are investing to make a “profit,” not those who are trying to find a nice place to live.
There are some ways our national government could do something about this. They could, for instance, mobilize federal funding to build housing, making it available at cost to individuals or families who live in the various local communities in which it is constructed, but with a resale price restriction would say that the “selling price,” later on, could not exceed the “purchase price” plus any verified inflation since the date of the purchase. There would have to be some further complexities, undoubtedly, but that’s the idea. That kind of housing would cease being an “investment,” and be useful only as a place to live. Of course, to fund this kind of solution the federal government would have to raise taxes, but given that the government has been reducing taxes for the most affluent among us, including all of our “billionaires,” there seems to be a pretty easy way to find the money to start this program.
The problem is NOT “landlords.” I’m with Appelbaum on that. The problem is the “system” that has turned residential housing into an “investment,” since that means, as a practical matter, that only the wealthy are able to afford housing. “Price control,” in its various iterations, is needed. “More” does not mean “less expensive.”
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
Borrowing a line from comedian Steven Wright who said, “The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese,” we might classify President Donald Trump as the early bird in his June 2025 bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities. However, as the first mouse, the president is caught in his own trap, as Benjamin Netanyahu sweeps in to claim his prize of deciding who gets credit for initiating the second incursion into Iran — in the planning stages since November. As John Stoehr of The Editorial Board states, our ally put Trump in a no-win situation toward launching an illegal war, though Trump could have condemned Netanyahu after the fact; but, apparently the appeal of being in a war had a greater influence on the commander of the world’s mightiest military. Allowing the foreign head of state to lead him around by the nose has resulted in a plethora reasons for entering into combat, and no matter how unconvincing those reasons put forth by him and his cabinet may be, it still draws attention — in the views of many — that Trump is probably not entirely in charge. It’s like Netanyahu told him, “I couldn’t repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder.”
That viewpoint is problematic for many in Congress who declare that if Trump was not acting in our self-defense, then this is a war of choice which did not receive the consent of that governing body. Now, Trump will have to explain himself, risking his being held accountable for consumer prices, the rocky Wall Street situation, and chaos and destruction all around the Middle East as the war spreads. The best White House rationale for the war is that the US was forced to attack, because if Iran was forced to defend itself against a lone Israeli attack, they would also launch attacks on US facilities in the region. Trump asserted to CNN that in his opinion “Iran was going to attack first if the US didn’t.” If the MAGA crowd has faith in this lie, Trump will have affirmed his dominance. If he’s seen as Netanyahu’s puppet, this will be problematic far beyond the abstract debates in Congress over war powers. The problem the president has initiated for himself is not rooted in high-minded principles like freedom and national sovereignty, but in conspiracy theory and antisemitism — terms given the veneer of respectability by right-wing intellectuals and gullible reporters.
The largely ignored isolationist group, America First Committee, has an unshakeable belief in a global Jewish conspiracy against America, which was beneath the drive to release the Epstein files in the 2024 presidential campaign. Trump represented the God-sent hero to fulfill a prophecy to save America from a secret cabal of powerful Jews involved in sex-trafficking young girls to untouchable elites, with Jeffrey Epstein heading this syndicate. John Stoehr says, “Once reelected, Trump was supposed to bring them all to justice. When he didn’t, he triggered a crisis of faith that can be registered in polling that lumps him in with the rest of the ‘wealthy elites’ who act with impunity for the law — the so-called ‘Epstein class.'” However, these supporters can shift from anti-war to pro-war as smoothly as has the president; but not being rooted in high-minded principles — only Jew-hate — supporters are not going to warm up to the appearance of an American president seeming to take orders from the leader of a Jewish state. Instead, they might see Trump doing to believers in America First what he has done to supporters who demanded the release of the Epstein files. Thus, the president’s lie that he forced Netanyahu’s hand. Yet, this assertion of dominance is compounded by his heel-turn in the Epstein files case — the crisis of faith within MAGA leaves a growing suspicion that instead of destroying the global Jewish conspiracy against America, he has joined it.
The host of Anchor Watch on Lincoln Square, retired Navy commander Bobby Jones, offered his opinion on a week’s worth of warfare with Iran: “It’s important that people understand this is not going to be something that is a shot-term or easy operation to get out from under. If we’re not careful, it’s going to make Afghanistan and Iraq look like a church picnic.” To emphasize the lack of leadership, Jones says, “Depending on which one of the three — Trump, Hegseth, or Rubio — you’re talking to, you get a different justification for why these actions are taking place, which is a telltale sign that strategically, people are not aligned across the board.” Donald Trump’s claims of an imminent Iranian threat are so unbelievable that the Associated Press had given him personal ownership of the fiasco, reporting that Republicans in Congress stopped a war-powers vote last week concluding efforts to end ‘Donald Trump’s war against Iran.’ Pete Hegseth, obviously replaying one of his favorite video games, said, “This was never meant to be a fair fight. And it is not a fair fight. We are punching them while they’re down, which is exactly how it should be.”
The Raw America blog reports that as President Trump was threatening Iran with annihilation on Truth Social, the “White House was quietly doing something that should alarm every mayor, police chief, and sheriff in America: blocking the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the National Counterterrorism Center from warning local law enforcement that his war has raised the terror threat on American soil.” The Daily Mail reported that the three agencies had prepared a five-page joint intelligence bulletin entitled ‘A Public Safety Awareness Report: Elevated Threat in the United States During US-Iran Conflict’ to send to state and local authorities. Detailed were elevated threats from Iranian government operatives, Iranian proxies, threats to Jewish and Israeli institutions, and the danger that radicalized individuals of varying ideologies might use as cover for their violence. Local law enforcement will never know how to respond because the bulletin never went out — Department of Homeland Security gave the White House a heads-up beforehand and Trump’s cronies put it on hold.
The White House didn’t deny killing the bulletin, with spokeswoman Abigail Jackson offering that the administration was “ensuring information being disseminated is accurate, up to date, and has been properly vetted.” A senior DHS official slammed the decision with, “They don’t want anything getting out that says what they’re doing in Iran is raising the threat level at home.” Such bulletins are meant to be politically untouched — neutral, fact-based, and issued without White House input. Such speculation was borne out in an Austin, Texas bar after Operation Epic Fury was launched, when a gun-toting supporter of the Iranian regime opened fire, killing three people and wounding fifteen before law enforcement dispatched him. Following the incident, FBI Director Kash Patel placed counterterrorism teams on high alert nationwide. As Raw America says, “The threat is real. The bulletin was real. And the White House sat on it.”
Hegseth’s accusations against the Islamic Republic that it is “hell-bent on prophetic Islamic delusions,” and Rubio’s statement that the country needed to be attacked now because “that entire regime is led by radical clerics who make decisions based on their view of theology, which is an apocalyptic one,” stand in contrast to the executors of the war which phrase the conflict in apocalyptic terms of their own — that they are fulfilling the promises of their own holy books, and that their justice is in fact God’s. As Séamus Malekafzali, journalist and writer focusing on Middle East politics, writes in The Nation, “Both the US and Israel have long asserted the right to commit imperial violence with impunity, while expecting other countries to pay a high price if they do the same. Now that double standard is being applied to the idea of holy war itself. Theocracy, it would seem, is wrong only when some people do it. To play an old trope: ‘The apocalyptic prophecies are coming from inside the house.‘”
The Raw America site exposes the central horror of this moment: “Plainly, we are fighting a war under the direction of a man whose motivations nobody — not his allies, not his Cabinet, not the people who work for him every single day — can fully explain. Trump has made something of a brand out of this. He brags, openly, that nobody knows what he’s going to do because he doesn’t know what he’s going to do. In a previous life, in a different kind of man, that might be strategic ambiguity. In Donald Trump, it is simply the truth.” As for the people around him, Marco Rubio wears the expression of a man who has realized the building is on fire. JD Vance has pivoted so many times he’s lost track of which direction he’s facing. And even Benjamin Netanyahu, after wanting American military action for decades, has the energy of a man attempting to cash a check before the bank changes its mind.
It comes down to one person who understands Trump most clearly — Jared Kushner — who is not in the government but is likely running foreign policy for his father-in-law. Jared collecting a $2B investment from a Saudi-backed fund after leaving office in Trump’s first tenure, earned Trump’s respect, despite not being a pART of the DEAL — or was he? The Donald’s reaction was blissful unawareness in his expression of satisfaction: “Jared can really work the Arabs. They like Jews to handle the money.” For some — who question what Trump sees in this war — it has nothing to do with strategic interest, security, or regional stability, but something far simpler: what’s in it for him! The oil in Iran (which the Israelis are burning, to his horror), reconstruction money, and Persian Gulf sovereign wealth funds looking for a post-war landscape to invest in. Perhaps Trump can’t explain why he’s taken us to war, but his son-in-law will figure out what it all means and how to profit from it.
As Steve Schmidt tells us in The Warning, “Only a fool would be surprised to discover that Jared Kushner is at the center of a growing scandal around highly sensitive national security matters — a torrent of corruption that follows in the footsteps of Kushner and Trump’s Middle East negotiator, Steve Witkoff.” Schmidt says it is stunning, with no words to adequately describe the depravity of the theft and their betrayal of the USA, as the full details of the sale of America’s most sensitive computer chips to the UAE become known. It is estimated that the Trump and Witkoff families pocketed $187 million and $31 million, respectively, in the sellout of American security, not in a corrupt business deal, but in an act of espionage. While The New York Times detailed Kushner’s $2 billion deal in April 2022, no one seemed to care, but Schmidt calls the corruption so gargantuan that it is beyond comprehension.
Trump has shattered every convention and tradition that requires dignity and integrity, while obliterating the law, duty, responsibility and obligation. Even the honor of being twice-elected to the presidency only bolstered his belief that his temporary power was a license to take, steal, smash, punish, destroy and avenge, with the current term experiencing his unleashing of cruel Gestapo-like secret police to terrorize the American people. Kushner has been an abhorrent contributor to American decline and division over the last eleven years, a sinister and corrupt figure who perfectly represents the fantastical levels of corruption that have engulfed Washington, DC in the Trump years. Schmidt describes Kushner as a soft-handed and fragile-boned child of privilege, whose only skill is the flattery of sociopathic egos. His family’s wealth obscured his mediocrity as he entered Harvard University, before diving into the “jungles of Manhattan” where he continued to prove that any child of an indulgent billionaire parent can make it anywhere…’New York, New York!‘
Kushner’s failed business decisions found him drifting into the Oval Office with Donald Trump, where they have done more damage to the US than any people since Secession, adding $6.7 trillion to the national debt, but parlaying $2.4 billion in personal income into their pockets. Anything and everything was for sale, with the American people being cut out of the equation, as the government was only for the Trump Crime Syndicate and the MAGA movement, with Kushner serving as an “informal advisor.” The ‘advisor’ was denied a security clearance, failing background investigations, as security officials deemed him untrustworthy and not to be trusted with classified information. Not a problem for father-in-law Don who then gave him the highest level security clearances, leading the classified-briefings-loving Jared to request them more often than any staff member as he began his flitting around the world as an architect of Middle East ‘peace.’ Both Jared and wife, Ivanka Trump, were “mediocrities who were unread, inexperienced, sheltered, arrogant beyond measure, and surprisingly simple fraudsters who didn’t know very much about anything except where to look for money,” says Schmidt.
Understood by most, that the US Congress is a thoroughly broken institution, though shining through is the January 6 Committee which showed what is possible when honorable men and women come together, putting America ahead of political parties and cults of personality. Schmidt says that in this vein, the Kushner payoff deserves scrutiny by Congress, counter intelligence officials, and the media until every detail comes out. Extremist movements are always corrupt and corrupt movements always become extremist movements — the NRA and CPAC being perfect examples of this circumstance. We should all care about knowing the details of what Jared Kushner did to get this money, as well as the reasoning behind Director of National Intelligence’s Tulsi Gabbard locking away in a safe a whistleblower’s report about Kushner.
President Trump has been insisting that he must be personally involved in the process of selecting a new leader in Iran, and that the Iranians are “wasting their time” in considering the 56-year old son of the late Ayatollah, Mojtaba Khamenei, as the likely replacement. Trump said, “We want someone that will bring peace and harmony to Iran — Khamenei’s son is a lightweight. Potential future leaders keep dying — everyone who wants to be leader ends up dead.” There was some political dissension among leaders in Iran about the hereditary selection of the Ayatollah’s son, which resembled a clerical version of the rule of the shah who was toppled in the 1979 Islamic Revolution, but the leadership of the Assembly of Experts were in favor of this appointment for prosecution of the war. So, in the end Mojtaba was chosen to be in charge of Iran’s armed forces and any decision regarding pursuit of Tehran’s nuclear program. The successor has never held any governmental post, either elective or appointive, and he is said to be even more hard-line than his father, which will put him directly in the gunsights of the Israelis, but Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and Lebanon’s Hezbollah both issued statements of support.
Trump’s pronouncement insisting on his involvement in choosing a successor was likely to complicate efforts to end the ongoing conflict, but now that Mojtaba has been selected, our president will view him as a “transitional figure” with a bullseye on his back, even as some Iranians are “chanting for his death.” The Trump administration may be willing to keep the Iranian regime in place if they accede to US demands involving the enrichment of uranium, ending their ballistic missile program, and an end to terrorist proxies around the world. CNN’s Fareed Zakaria termed Mojtaba’s appointment “a very bad sign for the war” in that Iran’s hardliners now have the upper hand, “showing that the Iranian regime is dug in.”
So we’ll just have to wait for a slithering Trump to provide us with an answer or justification for going to war, even as he demands “UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!” from the Iranians. Satirist Andy Borowitz offers his take on the new Iranian leader with this: “In a blistering takedown of Iran’s new Supreme Leader, on Sunday Eric Trump claimed that the late Ayatollah’s son was an incompetent idiot who only attained his position through nepotism. ‘The last thing the world needs is yet another total bonehead getting a leg up just because of who his dad is,’ Trump said. ‘If this dope’s last name was Henderson instead of Khamenei, he wouldn’t even be in the conversation.’ He added that giving someone control over massive sums of money just because he had a powerful father is ‘a recipe for disaster.’ ‘What kind of backward country showers someone with riches because of who his dad is?’ Trump asked. ‘All I can say is, congratulations, Iran: you just chose a member of the Lucky Sperm Club.'”
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |

Thomas is traveling and forgot to bring his book. He’ll be back!

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“ADHD”
“Not making it on time to an appointment because your brain has compromised time-management function is an actual limitation, not a character flaw.”
~Penn Holderness
“Procrastination is not Laziness”, I tell him. “It is fear. Call it by its right name, and forgive yourself.”
~Julia Cameron
“The problem is that everyone expects you to be motivated by the same things that motivate others.”
~Jesse J. Anderson
“The ADHD brain is built for responsiveness, for novelty, for meaningful stimulation. It is attuned to cues of interest and urgency, rather than arbitrary deadlines or routines.”
~Ronen Dancziger
“People don’t need to be taught so much as they need to be inspired.”
~Walt Disney
|
So, at first I was just going to link a funny video from the Holderness Family. The wife, Kim, just got diagnosed with ADHD, and there’s a funny song about it. I lost the link when my laptop crashed, and looking for it, I found this podcast where she makes the “formal” announcement. It’s a really good one, so I’m linking to that instead. Watch all their music videos, they’re hysterical, but do watch this video on ADHD. You might understand me better if you do, just sayin’… |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)










