October 28 – November 3, 2026
Greensite… hosting radio this week, back next week… Steinbruner… Redman-Hirahara House… supe office hours… Hayes… Politics and “Home”… Patton… Letter To A (Potential) Law Student… Matlock… wow…reality…just wow!… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Lady Arkansas by Sawyer Hill… Quotes on… “Humanity”
|
HOW AM I SO COLD?? I can’t tell you how many times I wake up and just go, “BRRRRR!” and want to stay under the covers instead of getting up and getting dressed, then I ask Alexa, “what’s the weather?”, and she says it’s 69 degrees outside! I don’t understand what’s going on there. Also, it was only today that I realized that I’m about to go back east… in November… LOL! I’ll let you know how that all goes!
I’m expecting to be able to post the column from Delaware, so hopefully there won’t be any weird glitches. I’m giving you the heads up though, just to be safe.
Happy Halloween, y’all! And vote on Tuesday, if you haven’t already.
~Webmistress
HAZBIN HOTEL. PrimeTV. Series. (7.6 IMDb)
Was going to do something serious, but I introduced Gunilla to “Hazbin Hotel” and she wanted me to cover it.
Charlie Morningstar, perky, upbeat daughter of Lucifer, decides that redeeming Hell’s demonic hordes might be preferable to their periodic extermination by Adam (a dudebro douche) and his angelic forces. To that end, she opens the Hazbin Hotel, where demons can earn redemption and a ticket to Heaven.
With the help of her girlfriend Vaggie, a porn star, a knife-wielding gremlin of a housekeeper, and Alastor, a theatrical radio demon who’s a walking “will he or won’t he betray them all?”, she struggles against resistance from both Heaven and Hell.
Oh, and did I mention it’s a MUSICAL? A good musical. Great art design and music make this a keeper.
Dark, adult, funny, tragic, and surprisingly hopeful, it’s one hell of a journey across its first two seasons. Worth a watch, and then some.
~Sarge

FEAR STREET PTS 1, 2, 3. Netflix. Series. (6.6 IMDb)
What if… Back to the Future was a horror movie?
I know, I do a lot of “spooky season” reviews, but next time I promise you the finest bleakness and most saturated human suffering I can find. Maybe something from Siberia.
For now, though, Fear Street, based on the novels of R.L. Stine (not quite Gersberms territory, considerably more adult).
Fear Street is set in Shadyside, a darker mirror of its neighboring town, Sunnyvale. Seems Shadyside has a long and bloody history of serial killers, dating back to a witch’s curse in the 17th century.
Cue the dates. The first film takes place in 1994 (with echoes of Scream), the second in 1978 (set at a summer camp, you do the math), and the third in 1666 (with a healthy dose of Witch Hysteria). All one story, not sequels, but a literal jump backward through time, from one chapter to its predecessor, eventually bringing us full circle to the ’90s. Kiana Madeira’s character, Deena, anchors the story, although Sadie (Stranger Things) Sink’s character, Ziggy, gets plenty of attention as well.
Despite its slasher trappings, Fear Street has more in common with Back to the Future than with most horror franchises. These aren’t three separate stories connected by a recurring menace, but a single, contiguous narrative unfolding across three films and three centuries. Each installment recontextualizes the others, making the trilogy considerably more than the sum of its parts.
There’s a fair amount of gore, but the emphasis is on the interconnected stories rather than serving up another helping of Purina Slasher-Chow.
I haven’t watched what appears to be a disappointing, after-the-fact fourth film set in the same universe, but the original three are well worth a watch. Watch them in order, and think of them as one long movie. Because, really, that’s what they are.
~Sarge
BELOW. Netflix. Series. (6.3 IMDb)
Below keeps threatening to be a deep sea eldritch horror movie, but it soon becomes plain who the real monster is, and, like anyone who grew up here, we know the townies are the real heroes. Set in the severe beauty of a Newfoundland fishing village wrestling with something …below. Below features a solid cast, bleakly beautiful cinematography, and a mystery that rises and falls with the sea, on various fronts. Not brilliant, but a solid enough tale. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
MONSTER MOVIE ORIGINS
IT’S SPOOKY SEASON! Let’s step back from the Universal canon: Karloff, Lugosi, Chaney Jr., and company. Go back just a couple of decades and you’ll find essentially the same lineup, only quieter.
As a kid in the early ’70s, I devoured movie history books, falling in love with films I’d never actually seen. They certainly weren’t showing up on TV. For years I assumed Edison’s “Frankenstein” existed only as that one tantalizing photograph in the history books.
Then came the internet, and suddenly I could watch a film I’d wanted to see since childhood. A hole in my heart I hadn’t even realized was there had finally been filled.
And there’s the original “Nosferatu”, an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”. Stoker’s estate sued and won an order to destroy the film. Fortunately, prints had already circulated abroad, or we’d have lost this masterpiece entirely.
So here’s the original monster lineup, before Universal made them household names:
- Frankenstein
- J. Searle Dawley’s “Frankenstein” (1910), produced by Edison. [Watch]
- Dracula
- F. W. Murnau’s “Nosferatu” (1922). [Watch]
- Wolf(wo)Man
- Henry MacRae’s “The Werewolf” (1913), written by Ruth Ann Baldwin. Sadly, a lost film.
- The Mummy
- Georges Méliès’s “Le Monstre” (1903). [Watch]
- Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
- John S. Robertson’s “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” (1920), starring John Barrymore. [Watch]
- The Phantom of the Opera
- Rupert Julian’s “The Phantom of the Opera” (1925), starring Lon Chaney. [Watch]
- The Hunchback of Notre Dame
- Wallace Worsley’s “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” (1923), also starring Chaney. [Watch]
YouTube is a treasure trove of early cinema. If you’re inclined to explore the roots of spooky movies, there’s also *Häxan* (1922), *Metropolis* (1927), *Vampyr* (1932), and plenty more.
They’re not just historical curiosities. They’re worth watching.
~Sarge
STEPHEN KING: A NECESSARY EVIL. Prime Video, Magellan TV. Movie. (7 IMDb)
Stephen King: A Necessary Evil – welcome to Spooky Season!
“Quadriplegic … unwed mother … telekinesis… waffle hut… and drat, aliens again” – Stephen King with his plotting dartboard.
Stephen King is one of those authors whom I enjoy as a person, but who makes my teeth itch as a writer. Which is why I really enjoyed “Stephen King: A Necessary Evil”- all about King and how/why he thinks about things. Behind the mind of the Shining, Misery, IT!, Stand By Me, the Green Mile, Shawshank Redemption, etc. Not spooky at all, except in just how much he has written (over 200 short stories alone), and impacted readers around the world for the last 5 decades. Fully worth a watch (and no surprise aliens at the end)
~Sarge
PRACTICAL MAGIC 2. In theatres. Movie. (6.3 IMDb)
Practical Magic 2: Magical Boogaloo… The romantically cursed Owens sisters are back, along with the principal cast: Sandra Bullock, Nicole Kidman, Stockard Channing, and Dianne Wiest. Joining them are Joey King and Maisie Williams as Sally’s daughters, who have inherited both the family gift and its rather unfortunate fine print.
The basic premise, for those who missed the original: an Owens ancestor, determined to protect herself from the heartbreak of love, cast a curse that has plagued the family for generations. Any man who falls in love with an Owens woman dies. This time around, it’s the younger generation’s turn to deal with the problem.
Unfortunately, the story has been so drastically truncated from Alice Hoffman’s novel (The Book of Magic) that both the plot and the characters suffer. Maisie Williams, in particular, is completely wasted. It’s fun to see everyone together again, but the whole thing feels fragmented, as though large chunks of the story were left on the cutting-room floor.
A pleasant bit of fluff if you’ve got the time. Otherwise, wait for the streaming release. Worth a casual watch, but hardly worth a trip to the theater.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
Gillian is hosting Bratton on KSCO this week, featuring two guests from DarkSky Santa Cruz.
Tune in on KSCO AM 1080 and FM 104.1 or livestream www.ksco.com
Call in with your questions and join the conversation! 831-479-1080
The topic is Light Pollution:
- What is it?
- Why Should We Be Concerned?
- What We Can Do.
She’ll be back with writing next week.
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
|
Here is a great video about the Redman-Hirahara House and Farmstead.
|
Have you wondered about the three-story Victorian on the outskirts of Watsonville that is visible from Highway One? The historic Redman-Hirahara House is on the National Historic Registry, and has a rich story that simply must be preserved. However, the County is very eager to side with the owner and developer of the modern hotel / strip mall adjacent to bulldoze this precious piece of local history and the only remaining example of famous local architect William H. Weeks farmhouse architecture.
Come find out the amazing history of the Redman-Hirahara House on Saturday Nov 7th at the Aptos Library. 10:30-11:30am.
Archaeologists Patricia Paramoure, Mary Gerbic, and Jacob Stone will be speaking about the Redman-Hirahara house located in Watsonville. The panel will display artifacts uncovered during archaeological excavations at the historic site. They will discuss what these items reveal about home life, community, and the profound resilience of the families who lived there. Pat was part of the excavation team for the site. Come learn about this important piece of our local history!
Sponsored by the Japanese American Memorial Pilgrimages (JAMP)
This was posted on Facebook by Ms. Amanda Dover, who currently works as a report writer for Pat’s cultural resource management company, and worked for Jacob as one of his research assistants while getting her undergrad at UCSC. She got to clean, photograph, and catalog many of the artifacts in this collection.
If you want to follow the legal challenge I am leading against the County of Santa Cruz, it is case 25CV02808 in Santa Cruz County Superior Court. If you want to help preserve this house, please contact me! My email is KI6TKB@yahoo.com
OVERBURDENED BY LOOMING UNFUNDED CALPERS PENSION LIABILITY
Come to CASI’s live event at 4:30pm Thursday October 29th for a deep dive into the risks for public workers, citizens, and taxpayers from California’s generous pension promises. We will discuss hidden costs and long-run implications already crushing city budgets. You will be shocked by how much the average citizen owes, and how California’s infrastructure suffers. We will also discuss how the search for sustainable retirement systems forced the private sector and the federal government to transition from “defined benefit” to “defined contribution” (401K matching) type plans, and how Social Security itself is at risk.
Major experts will provide key input to the CASI panel: Zachary Christensen, who is an authority on California worker pensions; David Quinnert, who has compiled the most exhaustive database on underfunding of Central Coast local government pension plans; Dale Byrne, Mayor of Carmel; Brad Imamura is experienced in management of government pension plans. Francois Melese, who is a nationally recognized economist, and expert in pension matters.
Specific facts we shall delve into:
- California governments are over $250 billion short on pension promises. That debt amounts to about $13,000 per taxpayer household.
- The cost of providing government employee pensions has risen by 50% since 2014, and taxpayers bear the bulk of that new cost (86%).
- The City of Monterey has to pay $14.7 million to CalPERS for its share of the system’s unfunded liability this year. This makes up 12% of the city’s budget.
- There is a grievous inequity between the generous California Government Pensions versus and Social Security Benefits, which can lead to government pensions being five to twenty times higher than a similar skilled worker in the private versus California public sector.
Challenge: Designing ways to recruit and retain highly competent and productive city and state workers to provide the best possible public services along with the lowest possible burden on taxpayer.
The event will take place at 430 pm, October 29 at the Community Shared Space at the Carmel Barnyard. Complimentary appetizers and non alcoholic beverages will be served. [California Pension Bomb/]
I will provide a link to the recording in next week’s Bratton Online and hope to have some of the panelists as Guests on Bratton on KSCO in the near future. Stay tuned!
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ROADS INITIATIVE ON NOVEMBER 17 BOARD AGENDA
Do you think it is acceptable that the County Board of Supervisors have allocated $0 to capital road improvement projects in next year’s budget? Why does maintenance of our roads and culverts get delayed and not well-funded, leading to catastrophic road failures, such as what happened on Valencia Road in Aptos in 2017?
Many other rural roads that suffered similar damage have still not been repaired. How does this all comport with the County’s Emergency Operation Plan for public safety and evacuation planning?
On Tuesday, November 17, the Roads Initiative will be introduced at the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors meeting. Please attend this meeting. We need a strong turnout to show the Board of Supervisors how important safe roads are to our communities.
You can share the Roads Initiative information here: santacruzroads.org
Read the Measure
Many thanks to Susan Tatsui-D-Arcy for leading this excellent work.
SECOND DISTRICT SUPERVISOR’S FINALLY HAS REGULAR OFFICE HOURS
Supervisor Kim DeSerpa has finally established regular office hours, and is scheduling a District 2 El Nino Information Night: November 12, 2026, 5 to 7 pm, Aptos Library (7695 Soquel Drive, Aptos)
Office Hours:
First Fridays: 10 to 11:30 am,
171 Aptos Village Way, Aptos, CA – 15 minute drop-in office hours, first come, first served. Stop in and talk about your concerns:
- November 6th
- December 4th
- January 8th
HOW CAN ANYONE THINK THIS WILL WORK?
How can anyone think this will work? Two 6-story apartments and nearly 200 three-story townhomes next to State Park Drive in Aptos, with poor access and an already-strained emergency response and infrastructure? What I noticed in the image is that there is something more planned for the parcel adjacent, where the Native Revival Nursery used to be and accessing Mar Vista.
496 unit development in Aptos CA
According to the County website, things are still in the pre-application phase. Supervisor DeSerpa helped it along by holding what was termed a town hall meeting, but really just satisfied Swenson’s requirement to hold a community meeting about the project before applying for a permit…
WILL THE COUNTY’S NEW EXPENSIVE RADIO SYSTEM WORK?
Interview with Jim Frawley on Community Matters on KSCO, Friday 2pm-3pm. We will discuss the Santa Cruz County Radio Interoperability Next Gen (RING) Project
Can the County afford this $28 Million project that depends on simultaneous interconnection of 17 new radio repeater sites and coordination with 21+ agencies?
Can the small fire districts in the San Lorenzo Valley afford to pay the $100-$200/month per radio subscription?
Will it work in the next disaster?
Tune in on KSCO AM 1080 and FM 104.1 or livestream at www.ksco.com
Call in with your questions and join the conversation. 831-479-1080
THIS WEEK’S BRATTON ON KSCO
Gillian Greensite will be hosting this week’s Bratton on KSCO, 6pm-7pm. She will have two Guests from DarkSky Santa Cruz. The topic is Light Pollution: What is it? Why Should We Be Concerned? What We Can Do.
Tune in on KSCO AM 1080 and FM 104.1 or livestream www.ksco.com
Call in with your questions and join the conversation! 831-479-1080
The program will be recorded an posted on the Bratton on KSCO webpage.
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. DON’T BE FOOLED BY MEASURE E..VOTE NO ON THIS REGRESSIVE TAX.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
Hopefully, everyone reading this will have voted for the Fall 2026 elections, but once again the issues seem to have barely mentioned the environment…and still we must vote ‘in the dark’ about the most consequential issue facing humankind. We would be much more vigilant if someone or something was coming into our “home environment” but somehow our definition of home has shrunk to behind our front door. The lessons I promote here apply in any election, so read on…
Santa Cruz Mayor
There is a heated debate about who should be the Mayor of Santa Cruz. When voting for the environment, one can look to Ryan Coonerty’s website and see the one priority: “protect our greenbelt, parks and bay.” His website goes on with these details: “Our greenbelt, parks, beaches, and bay are why people love living in Santa Cruz. I will protect our open spaces, keep our beaches and waterways clean, invest in our parks, plant and care for more trees in our neighborhoods, and make environmental protection part of every major decision about Santa Cruz’s future.” He has chosen his words carefully, avoiding critical concrete, measurable outcomes such as reducing litter everywhere and polluted runoff that pours from City streets as well as invasive species control, endangered species recovery, and stopping sprawling homeless encampments in the greenbelt. On the other hand, Ami Chen Mills’ website says “We must protect…biodiversity and crucial ecosystems” and she supports “efforts to bring the salmon and more steelhead trout back to the headwaters of the San Lorenzo and tributaries,” which is a little more specific about the ways she wants the City’s Water and Parks Departments to act to protect the environment. She also supports the “Dark Skies and Rights of Nature movements,” both of which are applicable to City decision making and much more specific than anything Mr. Coonerty has noted in his materials.
The dominant argument I have heard in favor of Ryan’s role in protecting the environment is that he would be “much more effective” because of his “connections and experience.” This attitude and marketing ploy unfortunately avoids speaking specifically to the issues and the lever points that the Santa Cruz Mayor can use in a City Manager controlled government. I posit that the wildlife dependent on decisions made by the City and specifically the City Parks and the Water Departments would vote for someone that will work to inspire and organize the people of Santa Cruz to pay attention to their issues. This has never been anything near Ryan’s mission, but one clearly sees it in Ami’s. Nature needs more advocates, and we need to support and lift up those advocates as quickly as possible in this rapidly degrading world, even if they supposedly have less “experience.” Meanwhile, for those of you who are so readily voting for “connections and experience” – where are you in helping to recruit and mentor the next generation working in politics, so that we have advocates for nature coming up through the ranks? How do you meter their time and experience so that when they achieve the metrics you cherish you will then turn your support towards them? Or maybe you, too, just refuse to vote for the environment…like so many others. What a shame!
Governor’s Race
Why not comb the other candidates’ websites and statements to learn about their environmental platforms? There’s the governor’s race, for instance. It is interesting that Democrats all seem to rally around the cap-and-trade method of dealing with climate change, though that is highly dubious. On the other hand, regulations that reduce greenhouse gas emissions work and those are opposed by Steve Hilton who turns instead to very dubious claims that reforestation, forest management, and watershed restoration will do more to sequester carbon than regulations: the data with which I am familiar do not support such claims, though I dearly wish we had better data and models. Both Hilton and Newsom support reduced CEQA regulations to expedite housing, and while Becerra has used the strength of CEQA to environmental benefit, it is not clear if he will follow the “populist” anti-regulatory pathway that Newsom fell into. Those who have followed Becerra’s voting record for environmental issues rate him highly, but his election website curiously avoids any clear pro-nature platforms, preferring a more environmental justice type angle. Isn’t it interesting how Steve Hilton is more overtly pro-nature? Let’s not imply that he is acting like his endorser Trump, when Trump said “From day one, my administration has made it a top priority to ensure that America has among the very cleanest air and cleanest water on the planet. We want the cleanest air. We want crystal-clean water, and that’s what we’re doing and that’s what we’re working on so hard.” Guilt by association is not something we want to encourage.
Assembly Pellerin vs. Pefley
Gail Pellerin has a highly rated environmental voting record and her website notes she is in favor of protecting water and air quality as well as the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Her opponent Carol Pefley has nothing on her website about environmental protections.
US Congress Panetta vs. Verbica
While I have long been disappointed by Jimmy Pannetta’s ability to protect natural areas from over-visitation, he scores very well in his environmental voting record. It is curious to see where he failed in that score- check out the website! BTW, much legislation reaching him is sponsored by big money, big business, and isn’t something that We The People have put forth. Jimmy’s opponent, Peter Verbica, has nothing on his website about environmental protection, although he says he wants to “Lower Food Costs by Providing Water for Farmers;” we’re not sure where he is proposing to increase water supply to farmers…no details.
Vote for the Environment!
I urge you to cast your vote first and foremost for the environment. Vote like your home depends on it. Can we please see our homes more broadly and think about what is happening to them? Some of my colleagues vocally and rightly promote indigenous rights. One thing we can learn from those cultures is to view our homes as entirely integrated with the natural world. We must cast our ballots accordingly.
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Every once in a while, a young person, just getting ready to head off to law school, or maybe somebody studying to take the so-called LSAT, the “Law School Admission Test,” asks me some questions about the law. Do you like being a lawyer? Do you have any tips on the LSAT? What do you think about this or that law school? Things like that.
Recently, a young person who had just graduated from college, and was thinking of being a lawyer, and so was studying for the LSAT, asked me a question that was quite a bit more “philosophical” (or more “profound”) than the kind of questions that I most typically get asked. Here was the question that this prospective law student posed to me:
Do you think that the worldly law creates freedom, or does it primarily create boundaries within which we are free?
As I say, this was not, really, the kind of question that I am normally asked, but I was happy to have been presented with that question. It’s a pretty important one! Here was my reply:
I think that the statement that “worldly law creates freedom” is pretty close to what I think. It might be more accurate to say that my view is that “worldly law” expresses our freedom, since our “freedom” is primary, in my view.
I don’t know whether or not your idea of “worldly” law is the same as mine, but you seem clearly to think there are at least two kinds of law – the “worldly” kind and some other variety. I agree with the idea of TWO different kinds of law. The idea that there are two kinds of law came to me as a kind of revelation (it’s pretty hard, now, for me to remember exactly when that happened). I do think that there are two different kinds of law.
My idea of “law,” prior to this “revelation,” as I have just called it, was that “law” was more or less the opposite of “freedom.” In other words, the “law” tells you what you have to do. While I don’t think I made this distinction at that time, our physical laws (which I am guessing are not the “worldly” laws you are thinking of) is what I was thinking of as the basic “law” by which we are governed. You, know, like the “law” of gravity. You can’t disobey the law of gravity (or other physical laws).
That idea was my basic idea about “law.” The law says what must and will happen (and this is definitely true in the case of the laws that govern our physical world). While It is obviously true that we can disobey human laws, I thought that physical laws were really the only kind of law that is really “law,” so that when we came up with statements that said what should happen in our social and human-created world, we used the word “law” to indicate that you “had” to do something, or had not to do something. “Law,” in other words, was always associated with “necessity,” not “freedom.”
Naturally, since human laws are obviously not like the law of gravity, I assumed that if someone “broke” the law, they should be punished. While we can violate our human laws, we aren’t supposed to, and if we do, we are, or should be, punished – and/or made to do what “the law” prescribes. I think this idea of “law” may be along the lines of “law” being a set of “boundaries within which we are free,” as you put it. This way of understanding human laws suggests that our human laws are intended to constrain what we do in a larger, overall view.
At some point, I changed my idea about human law, and I ended up with what I decided to call my “Two Worlds Hypothesis.” My daily blog is really just a set of daily reflections on the implications of that “Two Worlds Hypothesis,” and the “Two Worlds” mentioned are (1) the “World of Nature” (in which the laws absolutely say what must and will happen – “gravity” being the go-to example) and (2) what I call the “Political World,” the world that we create by our own choices and our own actions.
The actual title of my blog is, “We Live In A Political World.” I hope you’ll read it! I have a new comment every day – and have made those daily comments for sixteen years. As for the title, we most certainly do, most “immediately,” “Live In A Political World.” “Ultimately,” though, we live in the “World of Nature,” where the laws are absolute and tell us what must and will happen. When we get these two “Worlds” mixed up, the problems can be severe.
Global Warming, for instance, governed by the laws that prevail in the “World of Nature,” may well kill us all off, and eliminate the “Human World” entirely. Our “Human World” depends on the “World of Nature,” but since the “freedom” that we are provided in our “Political World” allows us to make choices that can conflict with the “World of Nature,” we can choose to do something that might end up destroying the “Natural World,” on which we ultimately depend. Global Warming could do it. So could Nuclear War.
My experience as a “politician” is what led me to the “Two Worlds” idea, and my claim is that in our “Political World,” anything is possible. The human world is created by our own choices and actions, and is a world in which our “freedom” determines what exists – and what doesn’t. The “Natural World” follows the laws of “necessity,” but our (political) world is governed by the reality of our “freedom,” and in “our” world, our “Political World,” the “law” is the expression of our freedom. In our world, in other words, we, essentially, write down what we have chosen to make real, and then, by following the laws we have enacted, we bring that “world” into reality.
I have ended up with a great enthusiasm for “the law,” because I do see the law as the realm in which we most clearly – and with great consequence – create the world in which we most immediately live.
“Politics,” as you will see, is the realm in which we most directly express our freedom (at least our “collective” freedom). We are each free to act, individually, but we can (and do) act in concert, together, and we have the freedom (collectively) to create any world we want (at least if that world is consistent with the World of Nature, which is primary). I often call that primary world, the “World of Nature,” “The World that God created.”
Much of what lawyers do, of course, is to work within the human world that we have collectively created, that “Political World,” in which the laws provide rules, and prohibitions, and outline opportunities for action, etc. Many lawyers, I believe, end up being more or less frustrated and/or resentful about the “law,” and of the rules that establish what is “legal,” and what is not, and which laws can end up seeming to constrain freedom, or to perpetuate injustice, and that may well impose constraints that are unreasonable, unfair, or even just plain “wrong.”
Since I have never lost my “political” perspective, I have never become as jaundiced, and perhaps even as resentful, as some lawyers end up being. So, I do recommend not losing that larger perspective. The “laws” with which we most immediately deal are the laws that we establish ourselves (by “politics,” by the way). What we “legislate,” in other words, will determine the realities which most directly affect us. “Law,” in other words, is a realm of freedom, not a realm of penalty and constraint.
That’s my view at least. Keep me posted – and really good luck on the LSAT!
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
A delusional President Trump claimed in an interview with the Washington Examiner’s Byron York on Air Force One, that his approval rating is really about 60%, his belief drawing alarm among some notable conservatives. His RealClearPolitics average at the time was 38.8% with Trump calling it “fake — I’m not at 38.” York asked him if he meant he’d be at 60 if he were on the ballot himself, he answered, “I don’t believe I could be beaten by anybody. I think that if I needed it, which I don’t, I think 60. Yeah, I think I’d be in the 60s now,” the subsequent X post spreading pretty quickly. York wrote that Trump “sometimes views his Republican base as if it is the electorate as a whole, which is why the low rating just doesn’t make any sense to him.”
Conservative senior fellow Henry Olsen at the Ethics and Public Policy Center responded, “Very problematic if the President actually believes his job approval is at 60 percent.” Rasmussen Reports founder, Scott Rasmussen, only contributed, “Wow, just wow.” Physician and conservative commentator Pradheep J. Shanker did a harder take: “He probably thinks he looks like a thirty-year old, too. Delusional people are delusional.” CNN chief media analyst Brian Stelter thinks his belief in a higher rating explains a lot about his behavior, and anti-disinformation activist Jim Stewartson observes that his habit of inflating numbers is only getting worse. “He lives in a sealed alternate reality — “the hottest country in the world'”— and expects the rest of us to live in it with him,” says Stewartson.
Progressive commentator Kyle Kulinski paints a darker picture, more pointedly after Election Day. “He is 100% going to try to steal this election after an historic blue tsunami. This country is in for a very, very rough stretch.” Frank and Ernest, the comic strip drawn by Bob Thaves, portrays four characters standing beneath a ‘Wonderland Campaign Consultants‘ sign, surrounded by stacks of poll data sheets. One character is introducing a potential client to Rumpelstiltskin, a media adviser who claims to “do a great job of spinning straw polls into gold for you.” Perhaps this is the alternate reality where Trump is gleaning his gold.
Alexander Willis writes on Raw Story that Trump is fuming over former President Obama’s Michigan crowd size, complaining at a Georgia rally that the media outlets never give his own crowds proper recognition. Obama had campaigned earlier for Abdul El-Sayed and Jocelyn Benson in Detroit, leading Trump to whine, “Now, he’s making a speech for Mohamed in a massive crowd! A massive crowd has shown up? Where are they? They never talk about my crowd!” as he repeatedly hurled his middle name ‘Mohamed‘ as an epithet against El-Sayed. He had the gall to dredge up Bernie Sanders speaking to massive crowds — “they weren’t bad, but they were a tiny fraction, 900 to 1,000 people” insisting that his own draw pulled in 35,000 to 40,000, yet the press “gushed” over Sanders.
The Donald’s “beautiful aide” Margo Martin may have some ‘splainin’ to do after filming a Trump rally in Florida, resulting in videos of empty seats. The clip of the crowd chanting “USA! USA! USA!” toward the podium as Trump took the stage, and a second clip of the president saluting a ‘patriot’ in the audience to strains of the disco hit ‘Y.M.C.A.’ drew satisfied smiles, but the sparsely attended venue shots that were posted were unimpressive to MAGA. One person responded, “Wow…very small crowd…there were more people at our bingo hall tonight…” and another declared, “The midterm game is over for Trump!” Others jumped on the bandwagon with, “Can you book a smaller place?..Can’t fill a junior college gym, hilarious.” Supporters wouldn’t back down with one calling Trump “best president of my lifetime.”
Barack Obama struck a few blows toward Trump as he spoke to a crowd in Cleveland, in the state that has received much attention in the lead-up to the midterms. The former president was in Ohio to campaign for Amy Acton’s gubernatorial candidacy, and Sherrod Brown’s Senate run, using his words to question where Trump’s attention has been directed in his presidency. “I mean, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but he seems very focused on home renovations. He should be on HGTV.” Obama gave a rundown of the projects by naming the ballroom, the Rose Garden makeover, the new helipad, and particularly, Trump’s gold-finish-fetish. “He’s got the White House looking like Saddam Hussein opened a Cheesecake Factory,” commented Obama.
After his White House appraisal, Obama took up Trump’s handling of Iran, blaming the war for pushing domestic costs higher — a war that “he decided to start that nobody asked for and nobody voted for.” He defended his own 2015 agreements with Iran, “a deal that everybody knows kept them from getting nukes,” by placing limits on their nuclear program while allowing international inspections and at the same time removing sanctions. Those inspectors reported that Iran was staying within the guidelines until Trump terminated the agreement in 2018 during his first term in office, causing Iran to push uranium enrichment beyond the limits of the Obama deal.
Obama added that the current administration was marked by “incompetence the likes of which we have not seen in modern times,” populated by unserious people. He accused Trump of excelling “so wildly at just straight-up grifting,” and framed the midterms as an “inflection point” to allow the electorate to say “enough!” Trump’s campaign promise to control costs were a smokescreen, the administration’s actions being directly responsible for rising costs, with Obama singling out tariffs and the Iran incursion. The former president tore into Vivek Ramaswamy for his campaign ad using Amy Acton’s estranged mother, saying that “the standards have gotten so low that somebody can run an ad like that,” adding that “There’s a decency that we should expect out of our public officials.”
Obama also went after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, pronouncing him as an unserious person who is “focused on important matters like the jawlines and testosterone levels of our male troops. And live streaming executions. How much time do you think this defense secretary spends looking at himself in the mirror in the morning? He’s working his hair because that’s how warriors look. These are not serious people, and the problem is, you end up having to pay the price for their lack of seriousness.” The latest from U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Mike Waltz, told the the Financial Times, the war could still be going 12 months from now, a bit different than Trump’s claims that it would last “four to five weeks” or some other random claim for a short duration. Unless of course, we end up “taking all the oil” by taking over “the whole country” as Trump threatens, but in his mind “the real question” is whether to “finish off Iran or let it wither on the vine,” or whether the stock market is up, down, or sideways, or perchance, Melania brokers another deal? So many decisions in this alternate reality!
The MAGA sycophants are still coming out of the woodwork with fake awards to ingratiate themselves to President Trump by stroking his insatiable ego. At an Iowa rally last week, House candidate Joe Mitchell presented the head narcissist with a cheap ‘Man of the Century‘ award, straight from a Hobby Lobby, price tag still intact in all probability. The Donald showed his Cheshire Cat grin with his best ‘Aw, shucks‘ expression, as Mitchell poured it on to “the greatest president we’ve ever had.” It’s gonna look just great in a fancy new gold frame back in D.C.
A new TMZ documentary describes a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and William Mersey, fellow inmates at Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center, regarding an alleged remark made by Trump in an unusual glimpse of his view of himself. Mersey had asked Epstein for a story that was “emblematic of Donald Trump’s essence,” with the sex-trafficker delivering an anecdote involving Trump, a private jet flight from New York to Florida, a French woman, and Atlantic City. At the start of the flight, Trump proposed a stop in Atlantic City to show off his casino, but Epstein said, “I’m not landing in Atlantic City — it’s all white trash down there.” The French woman asked for a translation of ‘white trash,’ with Trump responding, “It’s me without money.”
In a campaign swing for Florida gubernatorial candidate David Jolly, former President Bill Clinton lobbed some pointed digs at Trump, hitting him for his overhaul of the White House Rose Garden. “I think Congress made a mistake not protesting turning the Rose Garden into what looks like the entrance to Liberace’s bathroom,” Clinton said to an amused crowd. ‘Fox & Friends Weekend‘ sniped at the comment, providing ammo to spread in even further online. One X user posted, “99 mph fastball on the outside corner,” with another posting, “Old Bubba got bangers,” but some questioned whether it was “wrong to smear the entertainer’s memory this way,” especially in light of his own controversial term in office — the Lewinsky cheating scandal being cited by many.
William Kristol writes on The Bulwark, about early-twentieth-century Marxist thinker and Italian Communist Party leader Antonio Gramsci, who was imprisoned by Mussolini’s fascist government in 1926 until his death in 1937, who said, “The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters.” After reading about Vivek Ramaswamy, JD Vance, Donald Trump and Steve Witkoff, Kristol updates Gramsci’s formulation to: “Trumpism is dying, and a new liberalism struggles to be born; now is the time of monsters.” He notes that this famous line ascribed to Gramsci isn’t a literal translation from his Prison Notebook which reads “In questo interregno si verificano i fenomeni morbosi più svariati” which is translated by the late Professor Joseph Buttigieg (Pete’s father) as “In this interregnum a great variety of morbid phenomena occur.”
Kristol suggests ‘morbid phenomena’ may describe Trumpists more accurately than ‘monsters.’ “After all, monsters are in a way impressive. They can have a certain grandeur,” he says, very unlike Ramaswamy, Vance, Trump or Witkoff — conclusively, the ‘morbid phenomena’ of our day, “the visible detritus of a failing and flailing movement that’s, sadly, dominated or politics for the last decade — and that, of course, remains powerful today.” He decries Ramaswamy’s disgusting attack on his Ohio gubernatorial opponent, Amy Acton, by running an ad with Amy’s estranged mother calling her a “liar who lies about her past.” The mother lost custody of Amy and her brother, and fled with the stepfather accused of raping the 12-year-old Amy, staying with him until his death. Ramaswamy has only doubled down on his smear campaign, which is backed by a $4 million war chest.
JD Vance then showed his true colors later when he called Acton’s childhood sexual abuse survival a ‘lie’ and, “Whether the ad was appropriate or not is not really my concern,” the vice president said. At a rally with Ramaswamy, he praised his fellow Republican for having “the audacity to run a TV commercial which calls it out like it is,” expressing his disgust toward “fellow Republicans across the country who are whining” about the ad. Kristol writes, “So there it is, the morbid phenomenon of late Trumpism on full display: smearing a survivor of child sexual abuse; running an ad featuring a primary enabler of the abuse; and complaining that some decent people in his party are offended by this.”
He continues: “But the Trumpists don’t just like enablers of child sexual abuse. They also love brutal and aggressive dictators,” referring to Trump’s abandonment of Ukraine and his support for Russia and Vladimir Putin. And indeed, later that very day, Trump told reporters that “Russia, frankly, has been fine on Ukraine.” Kristol says, “Even Neville Chamberlain didn’t claim that Nazi Germany had been fine on Czechoslovakia. And Trump’s befuddled appeasement of Putin has continued full bore all week.” Andrew Egger, Kristol’s partner on The Bulwark, reported that U.S. special envoy, Steven Witkoff, joined the chorus, praising Putin as a “humanitarian” on releasing a 74-year-old American who was unjustly imprisoned for four years. “You talk so much about my president, President Trump, being a humanitarian,” Witkoff told Putin. “You are a humanitarian also, sir, and I salute that, I commend you, and I thank you again, ” which evoked a fox-in-the-henhouse smile from the Russian dictator.
“Yet another morbid phenomena of Trumpism: sucking up to a murderous aggressor and brutal dictator. It’s all repulsive. And dangerous. But let me close by returning, across the aisle as it were, to Antonio Gramsci. I don’t endorse Gramsci’s politics, or much of his analysis, insofar as I understand it — though my sense is that some of it is quite brilliant. But I think Gramsci understood this: You can’t just wait for the morbid phenomenon bedeviling the world to collapse on its own. Yes, fascism has weaknesses. And yes, fascism in its various manifestations needs to be understood and argued against. But above all, fascism has to be confronted. And then defeated. That was true in the last century. It’s true today,” Kristol concludes.
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.
“Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!
Who can resist a “Cozy Nook Brook”? I certainly couldn’t. Let’s see what we can find… wow. Unusual. Pretty much nothing (and a whole lot of noise from the generic nature of the name and other places named Santa Cruz across the world).
LocalWiki has an entry on Crystal Creek, which echoes Clark’s comment about the brook being named for an area nearby: “Upstream has been often identified as Cozy Nook Brook. A rhyme for Cozy Nook area nearby.” I don’t know how “often” it has actually be identified, as there’s literally no other reference to it (or the subdivision mentioned in the entry) on the web. I suspect, as I’ve seen before, Clark’s book and the references he cites are the sole source for this information. The contributor, “Harlan”, identified as “John Harlan Pilge” on his bio page, specializes in the Santa Cruz area, so I suspect he’s a fellow fan of Clark.
I checked both Google Maps and Apple Maps, and since neither of them show a “Cozy Nook Brook” at the head of Crystal Creek, my take is that this is not an official name for the spot, as otherwise it would be in the Santa Cruz County GIS system and in turn show up there. I’m going to guess, however, that Happy Valley locals use the term.
I can confirm that “Cozy Nook Park” actually exists as a place name. A couple of entries for “174 Happy Valley Way” in Santa Cruz County on real estate sites yield that as part of the listing, which I’m guessing comes from the County GIS database as a result of the subdivision mentioned.
If you know anyone from Happy Valley (or live there yourself), I’d be curious to know whether or not the name still has currency among locals. This is about as bare a cupboard as I’ve found after digging through references to an entry in Clark’s book.
The upper reaches of what is called Crystal Creek on USGS:9 in Section 28, T1OS, R1W, is given the fanciful name of Cozy Nook Brook on other maps. It was probably named when Cozy Nook Park, a very small subdivision, was laid out at the end of Happy Valley Road. See additional comments under brook in the Glossary.

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“Humanity”
“You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty.”
~Mahatma Gandhi
“Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive.”
~Dalai Lama
“Life is to be lived, not controlled; and humanity is won by continuing to play in face of certain defeat.”
~Ralph Ellison
“A feminist is anyone who recognizes the equality and full humanity of women and men.”
~Gloria Steinem
“Humanity is acquiring all the right technology for all the wrong reasons.”
~R. Buckminster Fuller
|
Sawyer Hill’s tour bus driver, David RollingCloud Jackson, died behind the wheel on October 14. He suffered a medical emergency, the bus drifted across 3 lanes of traffic, and rolled. 2 people in the crew were injured, and Sawyer has wisely and understandably postponed his immediate tour dates. There’s a gofundme to help the family.
Sawyer posted this video earlier than originally intended, saying that the words “I’ll be home soon” carry a different weight now… I think it’s a lovely song and video, so I’m sharing it here. I can’t wait to see him when his SF show gets rescheduled. |
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)

October 21 – 27, 2026
Greensite… on Mayoral Endorsement… Steinbruner… Town hall meeting for Watsonville Hospital… Hayes… back next week!… Patton… I’m Voting “Yes” On Proposition 40… Matlock… revolution…fused…flyover… Eagan… Subconscious Comics and Deep Cover … Webmistress serves you… Language idiosyncrasies… Quotes on… “Pronunciation”
|
GETTING CLOSER. Halloween is coming up, then the election, then Thanksgiving, and then it’s almost Christmas! I know you all know this, but hoo boy is time flying! I’m going back east to Delaware for a few days in November to attend my aunt Nancy’s memorial service. I’ll see cousins I haven’t seen since 1991, and I’m really looking forward to it! Obviously I’m sad that I won’t see Auntie Nan. She was a riot, and one of my favorite people ever.
I said “I’m going back east”, and had a think about why we say that. Turns out, as I actually deduced myself, that the terms “back east” and “out west” come from the history of U.S. westward expansion. The west was open and “out” ahead of you, and where you came from was “back east”.
Language. Gotta love it! 🙂 See you next week!
~Webmistress
FEAR STREET PTS 1, 2, 3. Netflix. Series. (6.6 IMDb)
What if… Back to the Future was a horror movie?
I know, I do a lot of “spooky season” reviews, but next time I promise you the finest bleakness and most saturated human suffering I can find. Maybe something from Siberia.
For now, though, Fear Street, based on the novels of R.L. Stine (not quite Gersberms territory, considerably more adult).
Fear Street is set in Shadyside, a darker mirror of its neighboring town, Sunnyvale. Seems Shadyside has a long and bloody history of serial killers, dating back to a witch’s curse in the 17th century.
Cue the dates. The first film takes place in 1994 (with echoes of Scream), the second in 1978 (set at a summer camp, you do the math), and the third in 1666 (with a healthy dose of Witch Hysteria). All one story, not sequels, but a literal jump backward through time, from one chapter to its predecessor, eventually bringing us full circle to the ’90s. Kiana Madeira’s character, Deena, anchors the story, although Sadie (Stranger Things) Sink’s character, Ziggy, gets plenty of attention as well.
Despite its slasher trappings, Fear Street has more in common with Back to the Future than with most horror franchises. These aren’t three separate stories connected by a recurring menace, but a single, contiguous narrative unfolding across three films and three centuries. Each installment recontextualizes the others, making the trilogy considerably more than the sum of its parts.
There’s a fair amount of gore, but the emphasis is on the interconnected stories rather than serving up another helping of Purina Slasher-Chow.
I haven’t watched what appears to be a disappointing, after-the-fact fourth film set in the same universe, but the original three are well worth a watch. Watch them in order, and think of them as one long movie. Because, really, that’s what they are.
~Sarge

BELOW. Netflix. Series. (6.3 IMDb)
Below keeps threatening to be a deep sea eldritch horror movie, but it soon becomes plain who the real monster is, and, like anyone who grew up here, we know the townies are the real heroes. Set in the severe beauty of a Newfoundland fishing village wrestling with something …below. Below features a solid cast, bleakly beautiful cinematography, and a mystery that rises and falls with the sea, on various fronts. Not brilliant, but a solid enough tale. Worth a watch.
~Sarge
MONSTER MOVIE ORIGINS
IT’S SPOOKY SEASON! Let’s step back from the Universal canon: Karloff, Lugosi, Chaney Jr., and company. Go back just a couple of decades and you’ll find essentially the same lineup, only quieter.
As a kid in the early ’70s, I devoured movie history books, falling in love with films I’d never actually seen. They certainly weren’t showing up on TV. For years I assumed Edison’s “Frankenstein” existed only as that one tantalizing photograph in the history books.
Then came the internet, and suddenly I could watch a film I’d wanted to see since childhood. A hole in my heart I hadn’t even realized was there had finally been filled.
And there’s the original “Nosferatu”, an unauthorized adaptation of Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”. Stoker’s estate sued and won an order to destroy the film. Fortunately, prints had already circulated abroad, or we’d have lost this masterpiece entirely.
So here’s the original monster lineup, before Universal made them household names:
- Frankenstein
- J. Searle Dawley’s “Frankenstein” (1910), produced by Edison. [Watch]
- Dracula
- F. W. Murnau’s “Nosferatu” (1922). [Watch]
- Wolf(wo)Man
- Henry MacRae’s “The Werewolf” (1913), written by Ruth Ann Baldwin. Sadly, a lost film.
- The Mummy
- Georges Méliès’s “Le Monstre” (1903). [Watch]
- Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
- John S. Robertson’s “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” (1920), starring John Barrymore. [Watch]
- The Phantom of the Opera
- Rupert Julian’s “The Phantom of the Opera” (1925), starring Lon Chaney. [Watch]
- The Hunchback of Notre Dame
- Wallace Worsley’s “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” (1923), also starring Chaney. [Watch]
YouTube is a treasure trove of early cinema. If you’re inclined to explore the roots of spooky movies, there’s also *Häxan* (1922), *Metropolis* (1927), *Vampyr* (1932), and plenty more.
They’re not just historical curiosities. They’re worth watching.
~Sarge
STEPHEN KING: A NECESSARY EVIL. Prime Video, Magellan TV. Movie. (7 IMDb)
Stephen King: A Necessary Evil – welcome to Spooky Season!
“Quadriplegic … unwed mother … telekinesis… waffle hut… and drat, aliens again” – Stephen King with his plotting dartboard.
Stephen King is one of those authors whom I enjoy as a person, but who makes my teeth itch as a writer. Which is why I really enjoyed “Stephen King: A Necessary Evil”- all about King and how/why he thinks about things. Behind the mind of the Shining, Misery, IT!, Stand By Me, the Green Mile, Shawshank Redemption, etc. Not spooky at all, except in just how much he has written (over 200 short stories alone), and impacted readers around the world for the last 5 decades. Fully worth a watch (and no surprise aliens at the end)
~Sarge
PRACTICAL MAGIC 2. In theatres. Movie. (6.3 IMDb)
Practical Magic 2: Magical Boogaloo… The romantically cursed Owens sisters are back, along with the principal cast: Sandra Bullock, Nicole Kidman, Stockard Channing, and Dianne Wiest. Joining them are Joey King and Maisie Williams as Sally’s daughters, who have inherited both the family gift and its rather unfortunate fine print.
The basic premise, for those who missed the original: an Owens ancestor, determined to protect herself from the heartbreak of love, cast a curse that has plagued the family for generations. Any man who falls in love with an Owens woman dies. This time around, it’s the younger generation’s turn to deal with the problem.
Unfortunately, the story has been so drastically truncated from Alice Hoffman’s novel (The Book of Magic) that both the plot and the characters suffer. Maisie Williams, in particular, is completely wasted. It’s fun to see everyone together again, but the whole thing feels fragmented, as though large chunks of the story were left on the cutting-room floor.
A pleasant bit of fluff if you’ve got the time. Otherwise, wait for the streaming release. Worth a casual watch, but hardly worth a trip to the theater.
~Sarge
|
Sarge, aka Jeffery Sargent, cut his teeth on the Golden Age of Hollywoood on TV and with regular trips to the Sash Mill. Film classes then, at Cabrillo with Morton Marcus, broadened his scope – he found he preferred Keaton over Chaplin, and Akira Kurosawa was his Yoda. Sarge spent 15 years working in Special Effects, on everything from Starship Troopers to Battlestar Galactica. He is a staunch geek who has a weak spot for Cozy Mysteries and loathes “Reality” shows. While he doesn’t care for the unrelenting banal horror of “True Crime”, he licks his lips over a twist like the end of Chinatown. Email Sarge at JeffLSargent@gmail.com |
October 19, 2026

The following Guest Commentary was printed in the Sentinel on October 18, however the last paragraph was left out. Reprinted here in its entirety.
Why would I endorse Ryan Coonerty for mayor? I’ve been asked that question several times. Some of the reasons are explained below.
I learned a lot running as a mayoral candidate for the City of Santa Cruz. It was my first attempt at elected civic office, although I have been active in city politics since 1980.
I campaigned on several important issues, foremost being the issue of overbuilding. Using data, I demonstrated that the city is going too fast with permit approval of big projects and far beyond state housing mandates. We are well past the “we need housing” mantra and even the “we need affordable housing” chant strikes an off note when you know there is no tracking nor evidence that such housing is mainly going to locals and local workers.
Also troubling is the city’s upcoming reapplication for what is called a state prohousing designation, which sounds cool but is really a give-a-way of even more local control. To receive “points” for a chance to access state funds, the city is required to enact policies that end public hearings, allow housing projects on public land, allow greater project density, remove parking minimums and rezone single family neighborhoods for increased density. Totally voluntary. The city does not have to reapply. Only a seasoned civic leader with firm policy understandings will be able to weigh this designation versus further loss of local control.
During the fourteen primary campaign forums, Ryan Coonerty listened to the data I presented which helped him reassess his assumptions around housing development. While state laws do box us in, and neither candidate can ignore that fact, Ryan has ideas and strategies to push back against some of this development. His detractors have tried to discredit his sincerity on this issue, but I disagree. I have found Ryan to be sincere and thoughtful. Most importantly he has the experience, contacts and knowledge to get the work started on day one, providing leadership for Santa Cruz at the state level, including at the League of CA cities which just passed a Resolution to push back against the negative impact of state housing laws.
His opponent, Ami Chen Mills, has stated that she supports “rezoning for increased multi-family housing and condos in our neighborhoods.” Such an increase in density of housing in single-family neighborhoods would be in addition to the large six and eight story projects, not instead of them. State law already allows lot splits, accessory dwelling units and junior ADUs by right. Rezoning for apartment developers on top of all this would change our neighborhoods forever. I don’t support this and neither does Ryan. Ami’s campaign mailers don’t mention her support of rezoning single-family neighborhoods, an omission I find troubling.
Besides confronting overbuilding, the other issue where I’m in agreement with Ryan is on the complex issue of the unhoused population. I supported the Oversized Vehicle Ordinance (OVO), the lengthy attempt to address long-term parking of lived-in motorhomes along city streets and in neighborhoods with associated garbage, sanitary and environmental impacts. Ami opposed the OVO.
I would like to see the end of encampments in our city parks and open space lands. Only Ryan has made his position clear on taking action to address this issue of major concern to most of the community. Ami’s position during the primary, as reported by Santa Cruz Local, is to open small partially-managed camps as homeless shelters. There’s no mention of homeless camps in her latest mailer.
People have reacted to my endorsement of Ryan Coonerty for Mayor in a variety of ways. Most contributors to my campaign who expressed an opinion have been positive. Some of Ami’s supporters have been civil in disagreement; others have been hostile and insulting. I’m a free-speech absolutist, so that’s ok. It reveals far more about them than me. From the outset, I communicated clearly that I was not part of a slate opposing Coonerty. I ran an independent campaign on the issues.
I’ve listened, I consulted with people whose objectivity I trust, I’ve evaluated each candidate carefully on their positions and on their leadership skills and the conclusion is clear. The more experienced, better prepared candidate who supports issues that I judge as critical to the future of Santa Cruz is, hands down, Ryan Coonerty.
| Gillian Greensite is a long time local activist, a member of Save Our Big Trees and the Santa Cruz chapter of IDA, International Dark Sky Association http://darksky.org Plus she’s an avid ocean swimmer, hiker and lover of all things wild. |
Find out what the nurses at Watsonville Hospital have to say about the hastily-made decision by the Pajaro Valley Health Care District Board at a Special Meeting last month to cut critical care services for labor and delivery, neonatal intensive care, and post-partum units. This Saturday, 12:30pm-2pm at E.A. Hall Middle School (201 Brewington Avenue, Watsonville), learn what is happening and why the nurses are urging the Community to immediately contact the Board and demand these essential services remain open…’The risks of this hasty plan to close vital services are just too high.”
Contact the Pajaro Valley Health Care District Board: e-mail: info@pvhcd.org or telephone (831) 763-6040, or visiting/mailing the office at Kathleen King Community Room, 85 Nielson Street, Watsonville, CA 95076
The Board next meets on Wednesday, October 28 at 5:15pm.
COUNTY FUNDS ARE IN THE RED BUT CEO JUST GOT A BIG SALARY INCREASE
Actions speak louder than words, and Tuesday’s Board approval of a hefty salary increase for the CEO, when the County leaders claim money is so short, showed poor leadership all around. Although she has worked as the CEO of Santa Cruz County for less than one year, the Board of Supervisors approved advancing Nicole Coburn’s salary to the next step from Step 6 to Step 7 increasing the hourly rate from $188.06 to $197.47 following her annual review during Closed Session earlier this month.
She now joins the big club of County management employees earning nearly half-a-Million $ annually.
State law required the Board to take the action in publicly open session, so the item was placed on the Consent Agenda, with a brief mention at the beginning of the meeting to let the public know of the consent action.
This is how the County will spend any Measure E half-cent sales tax increase monies, should it be approved. Don’t be fooled into thinking otherwise.
MAKING CEO SAFE?
The Board of Supervisors approved spending $88,475 to remodel the CEO public lobby and install security cameras on the fifth floor of the 701 Ocean Street government building to help the CEO and her staff feel safe. No one will be monitoring the cameras.
Apparently, someone stole a laptop computer from the CEO office area. The CEO somehow pointed the finger at the public.
Many thanks to Supervisor Justin Cummings for pulling this item from the Consent Agenda, allowing for a meaningful public discussion. It was too bad that Chair Martinez placed it at the very end of the day’s agenda as Item 11.1, when there were only two members of the public left in the audience.
When he questioned why the CEO lobby would be made more secure than the Board of Supervisor lobby, CEO Coburn assured him the five new cameras will provide adequate coverage to that lobby. She did not publicly discuss the extensive remodel her lobby area will be enjoying.
When Supervisor Cummings questioned the dollar amount for the project, CEO Coburn was dismissive.
She only laughed and said, “I thought it would cost alot more than this!” Well, well, it seems money is no object for the CEO.
She mentioned that there are no cameras on the fourth floor either. I guess the safety of those employees is not on her list of important things to fund.
Take a look at Item 11.1 to see how the County is further squandering our money
COUNTY WANTS TO SPEND $4 MILLION TO BUY 14-ACRE FARM?
Why does the County want to spend nearly $4 Million to buy a 14-acre farm with greenhouses in Watsonville, especially when money is so short, and the Board had to authorize using $43 Million from the Reserve Fund to balance the budget? The Board considered this during Tuesday’s Closed Session negotiations for property at 1203 Buena Vista Drive (APN 052-01-111). Under mandate of the voters in 1978, Measure J requires ag land be preserved for agricultural uses.
Is the County planning to launch a 14-acre Community Garden to help with the food insecurity predicted by federal funding cuts???
Stay tuned.
THIS FRIDAY ON KSCO
Listen in to KSCO Radio this Friday at 2pm to learn about KalKar Pond in Santa Cruz, Bratton on KSCO will be at 6pm with a great discussion of some of the issues raised during the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisor meeting Tuesday, and likely other issues as well, including the public hearing for the large solar array planned for Felton at the intersection near Safeway. That project will be considered on October 28 by the County Planning Commission. I suspect that Mt. Hermon is planning to include a battery energy storage system (BESS) on the adjacent flat parcel.
Listen in and join the conversation! AM 1080 and FM 104.1, livestreaming from www.ksco.com
MAKE ONE CALL. WRITE ONE LETTER. ATTEND A PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK QUESTIONS.
VOTE NO ON MEASURE E.
DO ONE THING THIS WEEK AND MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.
Cheers,
Becky
|
Becky Steinbruner is a 30+ year resident of Aptos. She has fought for water, fire, emergency preparedness, and for road repair. She ran for Second District County Supervisor in 2016 on a shoestring and got nearly 20% of the votes. She ran again in 2020 on a slightly bigger shoestring and got 1/3 of the votes.
Email Becky at KI6TKB@yahoo.com |
Back next week!
|
Grey Hayes is a fervent speaker for all things wild, and his occupations have included land stewardship with UC Natural Reserves, large-scale monitoring and strategic planning with The Nature Conservancy, professional education with the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, and teaching undergraduates at UC Santa Cruz. Visit his website at: www.greyhayes.net
Email Grey at coastalprairie@aol.com |
Saturday, October 17, 2026

Joseph C. Sternberg, writing in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal, seems to think that California State Proposition 40, which appears on California’s November 3rd ballot, is actually “French” in its origins. Frankly, I don’t really get that alleged “French Connection,” but I do understand that Sternberg thinks that Proposition 40 is a “dog,” to quote him on the subject. Here’s a link to Sternberg’s opinion piece.
Despite what Sternberg has to say, I am planning to vote “Yes” on Proposition 40 (and since I believe in “voting early,” I am actually planning to turn in my ballot later today, as part of a “NO KINGS” rally being held at 10:00 o’clock this morning, down at the Santa Cruz County Governmental Center, 701 Ocean Street in Santa Cruz. I am pretty familiar with the location, since I worked there for twenty years, from 1975 to 1995.
Here is why Sternberg thinks that Proposition 40 is a “dog” (emphasis added):
Proposition 40 has a good claim to be the most significant item on the ballot anywhere in America this cycle. That’s only partly due to the fiscal math and the economics of the proposed 5% tax on those with assets above $1 billion. On the merits, the policy is a dog.
As dangerous is the attitude Proposition 40 embodies. Its premise is that any and all private wealth constitutes an illegitimate diversion of resources away from the state. Despite the initial application to fortunes only above $1 billion, one discerns in the academic literature behind Proposition 40 no limiting principle.
This is foreign to America’s political tradition, in which property rights are a foundation of our liberty. The tax is entirely redistributive and punitive, and in this regard its philosophical radicalness is underappreciated. Probably because the danger it poses to the economy is so distracting.
I do not think that the premise underlying Proposition 40’s proposed one-time tax on billionaires is that “all private wealth constitutes an illegitimate diversion of resources away from the state.” I think that the premise is that “we’re all in this together,” and that everyone in our society helps create both individual and societal wealth, and that it’s both appropriate and fair – not to mention necessary – to make sure, when we face very difficult challenges, that those at the very highest income levels contribute fairly to our ability to deal with our rather daunting problems.
If you think that Proposition 40 treats billionaires unfairly, please consider the following, from The National Bureau of Economic Research (emphasis added):
We estimate income and taxes for the wealthiest group of US households by matching Forbes 400 data to the individual, business, estate, and gift tax returns of the corresponding group in 2010–2020. In our benchmark estimate, the total effective tax rate—all taxes paid relative to economic income—of the top 0.0002% (approximately the “top 400”) averaged 24% in 2018–2020 compared with 30% for the full population and 45% for top labor income earners. This lower total effective tax rate on the wealthiest is substantially driven by low taxable individual income relative to economic income. First, the C-corporations owned by the wealthiest distributed relatively little in dividends, limiting their individual income tax unless they sell their stocks. Second, top-owned passthrough businesses reported negative taxable income on average in spite of positive book income, further limiting their individual income tax. The top-400 effective tax rate fell from 30% in 2010–2017 to 24% in 2018–2020, explained both by a smaller share of business income being taxed and by that income being subject to lower tax rates. Estate and gift taxes contributed relatively little to their effective tax rate. Top-400 decedents paid 0.8% of their wealth in estate tax when married and 7% when single. Annual charitable contributions equalled 0.6% of wealth and 11% of economic income in 2018–20.
Do you remember that Sherlock Holmes story about “The Dog That Did Not Bark“? Sternberg calls Proposition 40 a “dog.” But, in this case, it turns out that the dog isn’t barking because there really isn’t much to bark about. There isn’t anything too unfair about trying to have the billionaires pay something, by way of taxes, that might come close to what the typical labor income earner is paying. You know, someone like me or you!
|
Gary Patton is a former Santa Cruz County Supervisor (20 years) and an attorney for individuals and community groups on land use and environmental issues. The opinions expressed are Mr. Patton’s. You can read and subscribe to his daily blog at www.gapatton.net
Email Gary at gapatton@mac.com |
A recent interview in Current Affairs by editor Nathan J. Robinson with New Yorker, and former Oklahoma interior designer and outspoken progressive voice, Jennifer Welch, has a rather disarming title: ‘The Only Way Out is Revolution — Why Moderation Won’t Beat MAGA.’ Welch has gained notoriety in her fiery commentaries on her Substack podcast, ‘I’ve Had It‘, and is willing to take aim at both Republicans and Democrats as a “rage-filled progressive” as she calls herself. In a previous life she describes herself as a “corporate Democrat with faith in the establishment,” but has grown disillusioned with a party she believes has failed to meaningfully resist the rise of the far right. In her conversation with Robinson, she discusses her new book, ‘Not Today, Fascists: The Lies That Got Us Here, and the Truths That Will Reunite Us.’
Welch details what it was like to grow up in the Bible Belt, what it taught her about Christian nationalism and the rise of MAGA, and why the Democrats stay on the losing path to a Republican Party with deeply unpopular policies. She tells Robinson that those she associated with when growing up had their whole identity in being Christian AND Republican, “It’s very fused together. There’s hardly any separation from those two entities, and even before Trump the idea of Christian nationalism in the Bible Belt was ubiquitous. The political right brilliantly projected themselves into churches because the number one indicator to determine if somebody votes is church attendance.” With so little daylight between the two entities, she wasn’t surprised to see Trump’s rise with all the evangelicals racing to his side, not as a Christian man but an evangelical Christian man, a Southern evangelical. “Think about a megachurch pastor, and then think about Donald Trump. There’s not a big difference there.”
Robinson asks Welch about her comments about church hypocrisy, when outsiders fail to see the adoration of Trump in these communities: “But how do you explain the fact that he’s a totally un-Christian and sinful man?” Welch’s view is that “These people are THAT. These people are exactly like him.” She says she can’t begin to tell how many such scandals she grew up with, growing up as an atheist whose friends wouldn’t let up on trying to convert her. “They wanted me to get saved, and their pastors were always involved in some grab-ass with the secretary or some person who went to the church. There was always some sort of scandal, and how they deal with this in evangelical Christianity is forgiveness with zero accountability. Monday through Friday, it’s play with the secretary, maybe do gay stuff, and come Sunday, ‘Jesus, please forgive me,’ then rinse and repeat.”
Welch sees the familiarity to Trump’s moral depravity and all his problems, to where it became easy for evangelicals to forgive him for the Access Hollywood tape or any of his shortcomings, because their own culture is moral depravity. Saying the mantra, “Oh, I’m sorry, Jesus, forgive me,” then sweeping it under the rug before moving down the road to the next scandal. Robinson points out that Trump seems to be leaving out the part where forgiveness is sought on Sunday. He asks Welch if she sees red states turning blue without a kind of progressive politics fusing with Christianity, and refers to James Talarico in Texas, speaking in a Christian register with democratic and progressive values — “How do you think progressives should approach religion?” Welch expresses her hope that Talarico has the “magic potion” to accomplish that, but is skeptical of the electorate who keeps returning Ted Cruz to office.
And, this is where Welch offers one condemnation of the Democratic Party, feeling they have abandoned the 50-state strategy. Offering her home state of Oklahoma, she claims, “Everybody says, ‘We need to make Oklahoma better, blah, blah. Well, if you don’t like Oklahoma, Alabama, Lousiana, or any of these supermajority states, it’s a Republican’s fault. This is Republicans’ policy. But there’s no Democratic Party there to message this because they’ve abandoned all 50 states. So then that leaves these crazy-ass Republican primaries where they out-crazy each other, and it’s a race to the bottom. I would be interested to see if a progressive — and it might take four or five election cycles — really went to all of these states and simply say these MAGA politicians or Republican politicians are liars. They’ve been lying to you. They use your faith to lie to you.”
Her solution is to play offense instead of defense, instead of capitulation to the narrative that we have to be religious — something Democrats are overlooking. Tell people plainly that Ted Cruz is a liar — “Lying Ted Cruz” as Trump calls him! She sees the Democratic Party with too many “bought and paid for” officeholders, who offer only word-salad non-answers, which doesn’t fly in flyover America. She agrees with Bernie Sanders who believes the idea of right-left spectrum wins by being closest to the political-median view is wrong, and that Bernie has more of a chance in appealing to Trump voters. In her estimation, people such as Bernie, or Abdul El-Sayed, or Zohran Mamdani can make the case because “they’re not political prostitutes,” when they explain the problem that neither party has delivered the goods, that voters have been lied to.
Robinson questions Welch on her opinions of Kamala Harris after reading comments in her book that Kamala’s platform was anything but leftist. “It was pro-police, pro-Israel, and pro-business, as she reversed her original promises to ban fracking and decriminalize illegal border crossings, not as an abdication of values, but in the interest of seeking consensus,” she wrote. Welch views Harris as an accomplished, exceptional, and incredibly smart human being, and she was all-in to advance her to the presidency as the first Black female to hold the office, being completely mystified how Trump got elected twice. She concluded that one of the reasons was the capitulation to right-wing framing by Harris, with voters failing to see much of a difference between her and Trump. Welch says Harris should run again if she wishes, but will not get her support in the primaries unless she comes out with some different tactics — any sort of corporate Democrat or focus group messaging is not going to play well with the electorate as we have seen.
Welch has been outspoken in telling Democrats to be honest and courageous in calling things what they are, specifically, the Israel-Palestine issue — referring to Kamala Harris‘ agreeing with the Biden administration’s refusing to have a Palestinian speaker at the Democratic convention. In going forward, the Democrats must forthrightly confront the genocide in Gaza, necessary if they want to be a party of moral values. To Welch, the US is funding a bad movie where they are the bad guy responsible for putting sniper bullets into the bodies of toddlers, with total impunity. She refers to the rural towns of Oklahoma where schools are so poorly funded students are lucky to attend four days a week, and even luckier if they get a free lunch — the state ranks 50th in education.
She thinks of the families from which those students come, who might have to forego cancer treatment and file medical bankruptcy because tax money is prioritized to assist Israel in killing Palestinians. “And there’s no room for daylight on this. The United States of America is on the wrong side of history — we are the bad guys in this story. It’s crystal clear, and the more you look into it the worse it gets.” Robinson tells Welch her book is appreciated, along with her perspective and dedication to criticizing and exposing Christian nationalism and the right — the Christofascist state in her terminology. He reads her conclusion: “The only way out is revolution,” as she writes of Republicans joining hands with the Evangelical Church, preying on the faith and the worst impulses of the devoted. “The Democratic establishment rolled out the red carpet by refusing to put up a fight. I’m filled with rage and I’m not holding any of my punches. America deserves better than the Democratic leadership that colluded with the right to bring this authoritarian takeover, playing patty-cake with the fascists and writing strongly worded letters,” she wrote, telling Robinson that hearing him read those words only makes her mad all over again.
Welch says there are not enough words that can describe how Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries are NOT the men of this moment, describing how Jeffries secretly met with Jared Kushner, and Schumer telling donors, “My job as Senate Majority Leader is to make sure Israel gets every cent they can get.” She talks of evil fascists being propped up by evil billionaires, while bringing up the big party with visiting communist Xi Jinping — “Oh, the communists are coming to get us,” as if they haven’t already! The lack of resistance from the Democratic leadership angers Welch, especially the way supporters receive treatment in such a patronizing way — “We’ll give you your marching orders. Here’s who you can listen to, here’s who you can’t listen to,” which works for MAGA, but the Democratic side is now waking up as they see funding for both sides coming from the same sources. Welch is hopeful for a rebellion within the Democratic House, seating someone other than Hakeem Jeffries; she sees no way Democratic Senators will continue with Schumer, and he knows it.
Robinson asked Welch to talk about her radicalization process, being an unlikely revolutionary type as a once-corporate Democrat, just a simple interior designer from Oklahoma. The eye-opening moments for her were in hearing Biden’s insistence that he was a candidate for reelection, as she saw fascism sitting on the deck. “He finally did the right thing and Kamala was in,” but another flash hit her — “This is b.s.,” as she saw Kamala parading around with Liz Cheney, “a great incubator of all of this fascism,” who voted with Trump 90-something percent of the time, the only disagreement being his January 6 coup attempt. Welch recalls the clip of Cheney, standing with a right-wing GOP Bible thumper, verifying that fourth-term births were resulting in baby killings, sort of like Trump’s charge that kids were getting sex changes in school. “You can’t even get an aspirin for a kid in school, much less a sex change,” she asserts.
“Cheney makes the statement with such impunity, little pushback from the Democratic Party, feeding into Oklahomans who would rather vote for a rapist to have more rights than themselves, or for their daughter — Liz Cheney incubated that. Cheney is in her position because of the progressive feminist movement, climbing the ladder that so many people fought for her, then promoting a lie from her top position that feeds the horrific anti-women erosion of women’s rights,” rages Welch. In seeing Kamala participate in fundraising with Cheney, she saw this one thing: “They’re never going to like you, Kamala, for capitalizing to their framing.” Her rage over this was almost released on her podcast at the time, but wanting Harris to win took precedence, and not wanting to be a bad messenger, it was cut. After the election, Welch started reading more independent journalism, stopped watching MSNBC, concluding that funding for both parties was out of control, which led to her radicalization.
Welch concurs with Robinson in his summation of the Obama years, which were a big wakeup call for the moderator, seeing Obama as a compromiser in his development of a health plan, and being pro-Israel — even though Netanyahu called him an antisemite. “With Obama, who gave Republicans so many concessions that they came back and said, ‘Thanks, but you’re a communist who’s destroying America,'” observes Robinson. Despite her agreement, Welch says she was “100% in the tank for Obama,” and still has a strong affection for him; yet, we should still lodge strong critiques of past administrations, such as Bush’s Abu Graib tortures and his lying to get us into the Iraq War, acknowledging that the Democrats had a big part in that, as well, with little to zero in accountability.
The lesson for Democrats is to examine what they are doing now, but go in and govern — put your accelerator to the floorboard and go full tilt like Mamdami is doing in New York without ceding points to depraved fascists — tough if they don’t like it! We have to fight for better healthcare, better pay, a better infrastructure, so why do we need approval from Republicans who make a complete catastrophe of government when they’re in charge? Welch says in her lifetime, it’s been war, deficit, recession — rinse, repeat — every single time the GOP is in office. Robinson sees Trump’s unpopularity rising because the electorate sees that electing someone manifestly incompetent and corrupt produces a country nobody wants to live in, yet he sees no promising Democratic contenders that people could support. In her book, Welch’s perspective is that fascists can be defeated because they are horrible, pushing through things people don’t want or like, but without a meaningful alternative, they might continue in power.
Welch says, “We need to take it back to the way it was, and we just need to govern incrementally; both parties contributed, Republicans more so, but both contributed to favoring corporations over human beings, favoring money over human beings, and not delivering for the middle class and working class Americans materially.” She says we may elect someone like Newsom in 2028, who will serve one term, to be followed by a “Tucker Carlson or some other nut because the country is so desperate.” Welch is convinced that the only thing saving us from Donald Trump is just how stupid and incompetent he is — if he were smart he wouldn’t be so brazen and going so fast, “but the fact that he’s so emboldened and moving at such a fast click, being so incompetent in his execution, that may very well save us.” Taking a page from Trump, the Democrats must learn that when you have power, use it, every bit of it, and GOVERN.
Robinson expressed his opinion that the lesson of 2020 wasn’t learned, only allowing Biden to squeak into office, probably because of COVID — almost an act of God? Trump’s virus response totally discredited his administration, barring his reelection. With a contiguous second term, it probably means that Democrats would have had no strategy for beating MAGA in succeeding elections. Welch says Trump 2.0 has been so devastating because he surrounded himself with incompetent, disqualified people — sycophants all, with complete obsequiousness to him. And she is still at a loss of why industry titans rushed to prop up a fascist. “They’re making trophies for him. Apple’s Tim Cook presented Trump with a trophy in what I liken to a humiliation ritual and debasing himself. You’ve got a net worth that could choke a bull, and you’re making up some c.s. award and taking it to this toddler to appease his ego?” Once upon a time, Welch says she regarded phrases like ‘billionaires shouldn’t exist‘ to petty jealousy, but now she agrees that “this class of billionaires should not exist. They are horrible people, horrible.”
On the Supreme Court, Welch says it’s insane that we have a court that is so reckless and so immoral in what they value — most claiming to be Christians. “They lead with their faith, yet value money over people. We constantly think the Supreme Court is protecting Trump, but no, they are protecting corporations, protecting a future where they want this type of rule that plunders democracy,” she charges. If there is the predicted blue wave in the midterms, she is hopeful that the oversight committee will impeach Thomas, Alito, and Roberts, and not ending up with a bunch of Democrats who “don’t want to upset the structure of the court.” She says the court is an evil entity with nobody to report to, the only people on the globe that don’t have a boss, and she would like to see the Democrats completely restructure the Supreme Court.
Robinson tells Welch that he has written a book on JD Vance, who he went to law school with, though never interacting with him personally, and that Vance follows him on Twitter. His book is entitled ‘Hillbilly Hypocrisy – JD Vance and the Dark Future of MAGA Politics,’ which deals with JD’s political transformation, while arguing that the post-Trump right will serve oligarchs and Christian nationalists seeking power and wealth. He still questions whether or not Vance will be a successful heir to Trump, or if his awkward ass-kissing will cause him to fumble the ball. Welch says he has no identity at all, changing his name three times, and ditto for his religion. “He has an Indian wife and mixed-race kids, and he refuses to condemn a racist Nazi group chat, and says stuff like, ‘Usha can’t help it that she’s not white.’ It’s just the weirdest. He’s the weirdest guy, ” she offers.
Welch recalls that Ron DeSantis was going to be the new Trump before his spectacular face-plant, predicting that Vance is on the same track. She reminds us that Silicon Valley’s Peter Thiel took Vance, a chubby, sloppy, poorly dressed guy, and combed his hair, thinned him down, remaking him into the “country’s top prostitute, and that’s really saying something considering who our First Lady is.” Both Vance and Ted Cruz have both hit on the fact that “if you have a face that people consider punchable or inherently repulsive, get a beard. Cover the face, and all of a sudden you look like kind of a normal guy. Vance has said that the most important moment of his time in law school was meeting Peter Thiel, which is really funny because he also met his wife in law school.”
|
Dale Matlock, a Santa Cruz County resident since 1968, is the former owner of The Print Gallery, a screenprinting establishment. He is an adherent of The George Vermosky school of journalism, and a follower of too many news shows, newspapers, and political publications, and a some-time resident of Moloka’i, Hawaii, U.S.A., serving on the Board of Directors of Kepuhi Beach Resort. Email: cornerspot14@yahoo.com. |
Each week, I will feature a selection of interesting and historically significant places in Santa Cruz County from the 1986 edition of Donald Thomas Clark‘s wonderful book, “Santa Cruz County Place Names: A Geographical Dictionary“, published by the Santa Cruz Historical Trust.
“Nuggets” If I find something topically relevant, but not necessarily directly related to the week’s selection, you’ll see it under the Nuggets heading. Note: for reasons of brevity, sources are usually dropped when I reproduce an entry. You can always email me if you’re curious, or, even better, buy a copy of the book!
What caught my eye about this week’s entry was a couple of things… firstly–the reference to Frederick Augustus Hihn (a very prominent figure in the history of Santa Cruz County); secondly–the inability of various mapmakers and chroniclers to spell his name correctly, yikes; and thirdly–the fact that the road is built on an easement, the text of which Clark quotes. Which I find interesting, as the fact that there’s a road / intersection there now is a byproduct of an agreement written 146 years ago not involving the actual sale of the land in question (which in turn has implications for how it can be used in the future, c.f. some of the discussion around aspects of building a rail and trail in Santa Cruz County along existing rights of way). Interestingly, his son-in-law, Volney Averill (mentioned below) is a co-signer on the easement as well.
Let’s see what we can find out about Mr. Schultheis (you can be sure I’ll be careful to spell the gentleman’s name correctly). Turns out, quite a bit! First of all, the entry for John Martin Schultheis on Find A Grave, which includes several pictures of his well maintained headstone, and a picture of his 1896 obituary in the Santa Cruz Surf and Superior Farmer (added in March of this year). Nice! Even better, an feature article in Mount Network News from February of this year, The Historical Schultheis Family by Debra Staab. Apparently Mr. and Mrs. Susan Schultheis helped nurse famous Santa Cruz resident Mountain Charley back to health after a grizzly bear attack (the subject of another article in the same issue), among other claims to fame (they lived near each other). The house they eventually constructed survived most of the last century, only to be destroyed in the Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989, and their descendants are still actively carrying forward the family’s history> (Google Doc prepared by Debra Staab for the Loma Prieta Museum on the 150th wedding anniversary of John and Susan’s daughter Alice to the scion of another prominent local family, Volney Averill). The Loma Prieta Museum also has this entry on The Schultheis Family, which formed the basis for the article in the Mountain Network News above.
![]()
A note about my process. I love just randomly flipping through the book, scanning for something that catches my eye that I canfeature in the column. This week, it was “Chittenden” (Nathaniel W.), whose name is all over an area of Watsonville he and his family once owned. There are five separate entries. Just before that, there are six entries named after places where immigrant Chinese laborers once lived and worked. They played a very prominent role in California in the late 1800s and what happened to them is a tragic injustice; however, the subject deserves a bit more effort than I can make on impulse, so I’ll feature it in a future column, or maybe a small sequence of columns (more likely). Finally, as I was writing this part, after picking something a little bit less involved to write about from elsewhere in the book, I noticed a couple of entries just before the one for China Beach–“Chicken Alley”(!) and “Chickentown”(!), which will definitely be featured in an upcoming column!
A gap located on the Santa Cruz-Santa Clara counties boundary along the crest of the Santa Cruz Mountains, 1.2 miles southeast of Highway 17 and Summit Road. It is at the point where the present-day roads named Old Santa Cruz Highway, Summit Road, and Schultheis Road meet. It was adjacent to the former lagoon, now a cultivated field, named Schultheis Lagoon [in Santa Clara County.] The pass, road, and lagoon were named for John Martin Schultheis who was an early [1852] settler in the Summit area. Born in Bavaria, Schultheis migrated to the United States and crossed the plains from Ohio. The name has sometimes been corrupted; for example, in a story about the building of the Glenwood & Summit road that appeared in the July 27, 1914, issue of the Santa Cruz Surf the writer stated that ” …the road crosses the summit at a gap or depression known as Schultie’s
Pass…” And while Regal Map Company’s road atlas of Santa Cruz County (REG 1984) has listed Schultheis Road in the index, it is spelled Shulties Road on the map pages. On ORR (1966) it is spelled Schulties Road. Schultheis Road had its start in 1880 when an agreement was reached between landowners and Santa Cruz County:John M. Schultheis, Enoch C. Ellis, Volney Averill, F. A. Hihn to County of Santa Cruz
and F. A. Hihn:We the undersigned herewith grant to the County of Santa Cruz and to F. A. Hihn the right to construct maintain and operate a wagon road forty feet wide from the Soquel Turnpike near the North side of the J. M. Schultheis Lagoon and thence Southerly to Elbon and Hock’s mill near the East end of tunnel number three [3] on the South Pacific Coast Railroad substantially on the line of survey as made by M. V. Bennett in the month of September 1880.–from Hihn Record Book, Vol.3, p.51.

|
Thomas Leavitt is the husbandy thing to our illustrious webmistress. A resident of Santa Cruz (now part time) since 1993, his interests include history, technology, and community organizing. He started the world’s first self-service web hosting company, WebCom, located at 903 Pacific in May of 1994. He’s been part of too many community organizations to mention, and ran for City Council in the early aughts. Email Thomas at ThomLeavitt@gmail.com |
“Pronunciation”
“My uncle is from Argentina, so I grew up hearing Spanish. My Spanish isn’t very good, but my pronunciation isn’t terrible.”
~Moby
“My father always wanted to be ‘Col-bear.’ He lived in the same town as his father, and his father didn’t like the idea of the name with the French pronunciation. So my father said to us, ‘Do what you want. You’re not going to offend anybody.’ And he was dead long before I made my decision.”
~Stephen Colbert
“I’ve heard every pronunciation ever, but the worst was when I was in New York for a radio show at some restaurant. On the door it said, ‘Now appearing: Kard Kiard.'”
~Karch Kiraly
“I get a different pronunciation at least every week. I think the worst one, or the funniest one I got, somebody called me, ‘Oh-gooz-man.'”
~Nnamdi Asomugha
“When you have to teach yourself how to say sounds, when you have to be highly concerned about pronunciation, it gives you a certain awareness of sonics, of the auditory experience.”
~Amanda Gorman
|
WHY DO WE PRONOUNCE… How words are pronounced in English is a topic of endless fascination for me. This is a guy I just found who does videos on it. Enjoy!
|
Direct questions and comments to webmistress@BrattonOnline.com
(Gunilla Leavitt)











